Saturday, March 31, 2012
The two faces of Trayvon Martin, actually these are just about the only two faces anyone has seen since his death. I've looked through image sites after image sites, nothing recent that I've been able to locate. The picture that the media keeps putting on their newscasts is the picture at the above left, it's a photograph of a young angelic looking innocent boy. The photograph above right also shows a young man, it is also Trayvon Martin.
The picture that the media uses, is pure unadulterated deception, no question about it. Had Trayvon looked like the innocent young boy as the media represents him, there's a very distinct possibility that he would still be alive today. The question is, what did Trayvon really look like moments before his death? Did he look innocent, or did he look angry? There is only one person that can answer that question. That person isn't Al Sharpton, isn't Maxine Waters, isn't Jesse Jackson, isn't ex-Black Panther Congressman Bobby Rush and it isn't Congressman Hank Johnson. That person isn't even Trayvon's mother or father, the only person who can answer that question is George Zimmerman, who alleges he shot Trayvon dead, because he was in fear of his life, as Trayvon was allegedly assaulting him. I might add, that it doesn't make a hill of beans that if Barack Obama had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin.
This entire ordeal has been turned into a racially fueled firestorm of false accusations, deception by the press and worse yet, an illegal bounty put on the head of Zimmerman by the new Black Panther Party. Who in my opinion should all be arrested and thrown in the slammer for life, as they are nothing but an organized gang of worthless street thugs. The arrest won't happen though, because the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder is a Black Panther supporter, and so is Barack Obama.
The scenario wreaks of accusations of racial profiling, which in this case especially makes very little sense. As the shooter, number one was a neighborhood watchman, of Hispanic and Jewish decent, and Trayvon was a Black 17 year old.
Let's discuss racial profiling for a moment. In my mind racial profiling doesn't really exist. Profiles are nothing but a compilation of like circumstances and like modus operandi. These compilations depict over a period of time the who's, what's and where's of probable happenstance. For instance, the series of terror attacks both successful and unsuccessful tell us that the perpetrators are of Middle-Eastern or North African decent, they have all be between the ages of 18 and 30 years of age. So, a common sense compilation of those facts, assures me, if I were to keep my eyes peeled for a potential terrorist, I would not be looking for a 70 year old Caucasian women in a wheel chair. I would however be suspicious of a 21 year old Middle-Eastern man. It's not a racial thing, it is pure common sense. When and if a 70 year old wheelchair bound women attempts to blow up innocent people, then her description would be added to the compilation. Not racial, just common sense. Regardless of what political correctness tells us, there are definite commonalities that present themselves when a series of circumstances occur.
Here are some statistics from a reputable professor and researcher from the Manhattan Institute. Professor Heather MacDonald had these facts to share.
From January to June 2008, 83% of all gun assailants were in fact Black and 15% were Hispanic. Together, Blacks and Hispanics accounted for 98% of gun assaults in New York City.
Translated: If a cab driver is going to be mugged or murdered in New York City by a fare, 49 times out of 50 his assailant or killer will be Black or Hispanic.
Fernando Mateo, of the New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers has told his drivers to "profile your passengers" for your own protection. Fernando Mateo is Black/Hispanic.
Additional facts we need to consider: One third of crimes in America are committed by Black males between the ages of 16 and 36, even though they only make up 2-3% of America's population. There are some cities in America where 40% of all Black males are in jail or prison, on probation or parole, or have criminal records. These are the facts, they are not a product of racism or racial profiling. These Black males are products of their own arrests, prosecutions and convictions of criminal acts against society.
Reality is sometimes difficult to take, but here in America we have a serious problem of Black and Hispanic community organizers and leaders, blaming the entire plight of their respective races on White people. In America, the Black crime rate is 7 times higher as the White rate. In America White crimes against Blacks victims is 3%, but Black crimes committed against White victims is 45%.
So, in closing, a closer look at what may have taken place that fateful night in Sanford, Florida, when a young Black man was killed. I have to ask, did George Zimmerman racially profile Trayvon Martin? Or, did Mr. Zimmerman merely profile a man, approx. 6 ft. tall, wearing a hooded sweatshirt, walking through a gated community where Mr. Zimmerman was on "neighborhood watch"? Considering the facts I mentioned above, wouldn't any normal person, either Black, White or Hispanic perceive Trayvon's presence in the gated community, in the middle of the night, wearing a hoodie, at least a little suspicious? It's time for the Black community to exercise a whole lot more restraint, and allow the law enforcement process to work in this case. Vigilante justice from the Black Panthers should not be allowed, or encouraged by Black leaders.
Perhaps the Black community should find more respectable people to listen too other than Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both of whom are leaches on the Black community they claim to be supporting. It's time for the Black community to also take a second look at the representatives they elect to congress and the Senate. Race-baiters like Maxine Waters, and Frederica Wilson only bring divisiveness to America, not unity. Men like Rep. Hank Johnson and Bobby Rush, are poor representatives of the true Black community. Remember, Congressman Hank Johnson was concerned about the island of Guam capsizing if too many Marines were stationed there. Booby Rush donning a hoodie in the well of congress shows just how inept at sensible rhetoric this man is.
If there is to be justice for Trayvon Martin, then it is imperative that it be by the laws of this land. We are a nation of laws, and it must remain that way. Trial by public opinion is not a trial at all, but a mob rule. It is justice that we must strive for, not a Black/White standoff. Blowing this entire event into a race war, is not going to be beneficial for either race. In the end, if George Zimmerman is found guilty by a preponderance of evidence, then so be it. By the same token, if George Zimmerman is found to be innocent, that decision must also be respected and adhered to. It must be that way!!!
God Help Us
Friday, March 30, 2012
|BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA|
"THE REPUBLIC'S ENEMY NO. 1
As if implementing the new EPA Carbon Cap this Tuesday wasn't enough, the Big "O" has decided to usurp even more power by a secret vote and signing legislation that will essentially withdraw power from the Bill of Rights, and move that power to, you guessed it, the President himself. Oh, did you misunderstand me, or did I make an error? No, I did not, this piece of legislation H.R. 347 (to be exact), was actually drafted by Sen. John McCain (R) and Sen. Carl Levin (D). They merely drafted the bill, it was actually voted on and passed by our (supposed) conservative congress. Make no mistake about it, there is something very big and very sinister about to happen within this government. There are no, or at least very few conservatives left in D.C.. Leftists, Communists, Maoists, Socialists and Progressives are in control, and I'm not sure we can stop them. Both sides of the aisle have been corrupted and they are voting our very Constitutional rights away, and with every stroke of his pen, Obama makes another stride toward his dictatorship over the United States. Obviously, with the blessing of congress. There was a time when We the People could take stock in the fact that we had rights and liberties that were protected under the Constitution, that's not the case anymore my friends, not by a long shot. The essence of H.R. 347, more commonly referred to as the "McCain-Levin US Citizen Imprisonment Bill". The bill, in effect does away with the Fourteenth Amendment's "due-process under the law clause which mandates: "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Obama quickly signed the bill and issued a signing statement outlining his newly acquired powers. Obama's statement reads: " I have concluded that section 1022 provides the minimally acceptable amount of flexibility to protect national security. Specifically, I have signed this bill on the understanding that section 1022 provides the Executive branch with broad authority to determine how best to implement it, and with the full and unencumbered ability to waive any military custody requirement, including the option of waiving appropriate categories of cases when doing so, is in the national security interests of the United States." Simply put, although section 1022 provides a thin structure, one sentence "protection" for US citizens and legal alien residents, Obama claims he can now affect its subordination to his will and use the "national security" excuse to eliminate due process for anyone who may oppose him and or his policies. Do we fully comprehend what extensive powers the congress has just given the President? Given the mere notion that for example, yours truly "The Watchman" offends and speaks out with the truth against Barack Obama, he (Obama) can declare me a threat to (his) national security. He can then have me arrested, thrown into prison, no filing of charges, no trial, no chance for release, or escape. Does the term "political prisoner" ring a bell? Obama's eminent crackdown on those he will term "subversives", who we call "patriots", won't begin with someone like me, I'm small potatoes, but it won't end with me either. The time will come when a parent will slip and say something derogatory about the President or his policies in front of his children. The child will tell his public school teacher what daddy or mommy said about the President, and when little Johnny or little Mary gets home from school that afternoon, daddy or mommy, or both will never be heard from again. Think I'm talking an impossibility here? Speak with the German folks from Hitler's youth. The youth were indoctrinated in school (sound familiar?) to rat on their own parents, many of them did, and many parents disappeared.
Is it any wonder that Obama shows little concern over being re-elected in 2012? Is it any wonder that he felt totally confident when he spoke to La Raza a few weeks back, and told them not to worry about amnesty, "he still has 5 more years to accomplish what he promised them."? Is it any surprise that Obama told the Russians that "he will have more flexibility after the 2012 election" to gut our military even more than he already has? Either the man has an exorbitant amount of confidence in himself, or he has an alternate plan, in case the Democratic Election thing doesn't look like it's going to work out for him.
In my opinion, America has a lot to fear, but not necessarily from outside our borders. A healthy fear of our own President and his schemes would be most beneficial at this time. This President has managed to usurp the power of the people as no other President in history. He has taken every step to destroy the economy, gain power over energy, transportation, food and even water. He has managed to turn a once thriving nation with a work ethic that was the envy of the world, into a nanny entitlement, government dependent pathetic nation of narcissistic sheeple. He has divided the people by race, class, and gender, he is not inept, he is not stupid, he is not clueless, he knows a nation divided within itself can not stand, and America is folding up like a rusty old lawn chair.
Please Google HR 347, or " USA under Siege" or Canada Free Press archives, read it for yourself, if you're not convinced that Barack Obama is this "Republic's Enemy #1", then I can't help you. You may be confused about my use of the "Canada Free Press", well here is their motto: "Because Without America there is no free world." They are right!
"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." (John Adams)
God Help Us
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Then and Now
The end of an era, but not very much fanfare. Saying goodbye to the final printing of this, perhaps the last reference book to take the fatal fall to modern technology. Above left is a picture of the first ever Encyclopedia Britannica, 3 volumes printed in the year of our Lord 1768. Above right is a picture of the last printed version of the same reference collection, 32 volumes containing 44 million words. Never again will those words or pictures grace the pages in book form. It's sad, really. Shouldn't there be a funeral or something? Where will those folks who turned to encyclopedias for reference going to get their closure? From this point forward, documentation of all the world's epic events, will be in a digital format. In itself, the demise of reference books is an epic event, that should be remembered, somehow, but how? Digitally, that's how.
Have we ever stopped to wonder, if even for a moment where this new technology is leading the human race? Kindles, Nooks and a host of other electronic books are available, and becoming widely used by the thousands with every passing day. The ability to download books from that eerily secret digital library moving through the air-waves. Here is a question, when one downloads "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn", are they downloading the original version, or a digitally edited, politically correct version. I do not own a Kindle or Nook, but I'm guessing that if you download it on your e-book device, it will not come in it's original language story as written by Mark Twain. Will there be a tar-baby, an Uncle Remus? I doubt it. If you're like me, you've already socked away original versions of Mark Twain's classics. Even the new ones in print have been molested by the P.C. crowd.
Once again, where are we as a human race, going with this technology? I attend a Baptist church, yep, that's right a clinging to my Bible and my guns kind of crowd. I have noticed however, all around me in the rows of pews, there are less and less printed Bibles, and more and more e-Bibles. Okay, they're not near as cumbersome as a large print printed Bible, they're small, compact and light weight. It even shows a page turning when you run your finger across the bottom, and some will even give you the synthesized sound of an actual paper page turning, sweet, huh? I'm going to guess that in about 5 years, you will be very hard pressed to find a printed Bible in a house of worship. The entire congregation will staring into a little electronic LCD book, while the preacher reads from his own personal Kindle or Nook. But, what about 10 or 15 years from now? Did it ever occur to anyone that digital books can and have been, and will be digitally altered. In 15 years from now, without a printed Bible, will anyone question the context or the contents of their digital electronic Bible? Or, will they just take it as well... Gospel? Will the Christians even notice the omission of Lev. 18:22, or Lev. 20:13. Will verses from Corinthians like 1Cor. 6:9-10, or maybe Rom.1: 26-28 be altered or removed completely? You can bet that the Progressive/Liberal governments will be picking and choosing what will be in the e-Bibles. The question is, will your children recognize the omissions and alterations, will they have a printed version to make the cross reference?
I may be pushing the envelope here, going out on the limb, as it were, but this is what I see for the future of mankind. In 15 years, most if not all the libraries will be totally devoid of printed books. There will be kiosks upon kiosks of computer generated e-book machines. I see the far left of every country deciding that there is no longer a use for printed matter of any kind, including books. Of course all printing will cease, due to the environmental movement to save the trees, there-by saving the planet. All the books that are chosen will be digitally transformed for your reading pleasure. They won't all be available however, only the chosen books will be digitally remade. Any controversial books will be eliminated as if they never existed. Mark Twain's classics will be unrecognizable to any of us left, who have actually read the original version. The Holy Bible will have been so distorted by the left, that it also will bear no resemblance to the printed word of God we have today.
This is just the beginning of the end my friends. Things will go down hill from here, but the slide will be so diabolically gradual, it will hardly be noticed, sort of like the demise of the printed version of Britannica. No long good-byes, no memorials, and eventually no record of the past. It is intended that Britannica will continue to be published online, as the Bible, and numerous other books of note, but how will we know that the truth is online, where will we make cross references? The only truth that humans will know, is the truth that will be electronically imparted and implanted to their brains by whoever decides what the truth is to be at the time.
With the invention of the computer, I suppose that the loss and eradication of the printed word should come as no surprise. Books aren't the only tangibles falling by the wayside, we have digital money now, and soon currency you can hold in you hand will certainly be a thing of the past. Time marches on...
Allow me to nudge your imagination, just a bit. Close you eyes, go back to a time when books were the only source of reference and entertainment, (pretend if you must). Run your hands over the embossed cover, over the spine, raise it to your nose, smell the pages and the old ink. mmmmmmmm, is it an old turn of the century book, maybe older? Does it smell like years of use, sort of musty, with still a hint of the old ink. Can you feel the sensitivities of the author as he tells the story? Your book has many hearts you know, it first has the heart of the writer, then the heart of the hand set type-set from the printers table, the heart of the final proof reader, who has checked to make sure of the spellings and the grammar, the person who makes sure that when you read this book, there will be no obvious grammatical errors. It has the heart of the book binder, who painstakingly bound all the pages, glued the spine so that every page will be in it's proper place, and will turn crisply from page one to the 'THE END'. When you're finished reading a printed book, you take away with you the hearts and the emotions and sensibilities of all who contributed to it, and forever you'll share their contributions in your heart of hearts.
Now pick up your Kindle, your Nook, where's the warmth, can you feel the heart, can you smell the pages? I'm afraid not, a true shame. The new Dark Ages are upon us, and all the human race sees are the those little points of light, no, not the stars, the LEDs.
God Help Us
Monday, March 26, 2012
It is not my intention to diminish the seriousness of the tragic death of this young Iraqi immigrant mother. I would also like to extend my condolences to her children.
At the risk of soundly cynical, I am expressing my personal belief that there is more to this tragic story than is being brought to light, at least at this time. The beating death of a young Muslim wife and mother has all the earmarks of an honor killing, not a hate crime.
After having studied Islam, the Qur'an and the behavior of Islamic husbands, sons, brothers and fathers, the evidence in this case is extremely similar to many, and I mean many honor killings. Most of these, if not all have been perpetrated by a close family member, and with the knowledge of most of the rest of the family.
Forgive me if I'm a little skeptical of the evidence and a lot suspicious of the husband. The "note" found next to the body that reads: "go back to your country". (Raised my eyebrow) Certainly, the possibility that that note was left by an outside culprit could be true. However, a note that reads that way... smells like a deliberate misdirection left by the real perpetrator. Let's examine the circumstances that have been released so far. Shaima was beaten in her home with a tire iron, but no one in this closely knit community saw a person walking up the driveway, in broad daylight with a tire iron, and so far, nothing has been released about anybody being seen leaving after the assault, once again in broad daylight. I also find it very suspicious that "dad" was the one who was conveniently taking the younger children to school that morning, and not mom. If this heinous crime was committed by someone outside the family, the suspect would had to have been watching the house as "dad" left with the kids. If I were a detective with the El Cajon police department, I'd be grilling "dad" right now! Here is another very suspicious statement released to the press: " Shaima Alawadi is a respectful modest muhajiba." (that means obediently wears the traditional hijab, i.e., headscarf) I have to ask, what would a family member, or a Muslim cleric or a counselor from CAIR, be doing by making a statement like that? I'll tell you why that statement was made, it was made to throw suspicion off "dad", "husband", "father", and back on to the "hate crime" note left by the body. Allegedly, a similar note was found outside the home earlier in the year, but the Alawadi's never reported it to the police. I find that very, very suspicious. For one thing, had there been an earlier "hate crime" note the Alawadi family would not be able to resist calling it to the attention of CAIR, the police and any news media that would listen, it's what Muslims do, it's their "victim ploy" for sympathy. It is not typical for a Muslim family in a new neighborhood, to dismiss a "hate note" as a children's prank, as the family stated. There are way too many things here that do not add up.
I have to ask, why a tire iron, and whose tire iron was it? The brutality of beating someone with a tire iron is something that is done out of spontaneous anger perhaps, not a run of the mill, get out of my country hate crime, it's too barbaric, too messy. Why just Shaima, why not target "dad"? Why not target the children, or the entire family? That could constitute a hate crime. In my mind, for this horrendous murder to be perpetrated by an outsider, someone who didn't really know this lady, screams too me, like something in the "modus operendi" of Charles Manson and his ilk. However, that's a highly unlikely scenario. No sir, the more I read and study this crime, the more I see honor killing, or a typical case of a Muslim husband beating his wife into submission, and he let his temper get way out of hand. I also feel that the some of the children, if not all, know who did this, and they are understandably afraid to speak out. It's the Muslim way. I am almost 100% sure that a serious investigation will reveal that this murder of a Muslim wife and mother was an inside job.
Right now, the Muslim communities across America are up in arms, even purported to be in shock. A million hajib march is being organized in the victims honor. I'm sure a fatwa is being written for the proverbial head of the person who committed this crime. Unless of course, it was her husband, or her father. In which case, under Sharia law, not only is the beating forgivable, but understood, and if Shaima dishonored her family, her murder would be understood, condoned and encouraged. Deep down, the Muslim communities are even more suspicious about this than I am. I pray that the police investigating this murder spend a significant amount of time interrogating the immediate family. Because San Diego, California has the second largest Muslim population in the U.S., next to Michigan, approx. 40,000, the San Diego area law enforcement organizations will be seeing more and more of this type of violence in those neighborhoods.
The liberal media was as quick to jump on the hate crime angle with this story, as they were with the Florida story of Trayvon Martin's killing by Mr. Zimmerman. Unfortunately, now that the entire Black population in America was calling for the lynching of Mr. Zimmerman, an eye-witness comes forward, and states the Mr. Zimmerman was the one being attacked by Trayvon (the little hoodie wearing street thug), and that Mr. Zimmerman did in actuality shoot in self defense. The picture of Trayvon Martin that is in all the papers, depict him as a young innocent teen with an angelic face, but now, was he really as angelic as his family and friends made him out to be? I wonder if Barack Obama is still going to relate to Trayvan as the son he never had? I see Obama putting some distance between Trayvon and himself on this one. The eye-witness account, explains why there were no charges or arrests made in the case, as the police obviously saw Zimmerman as the victim, not the criminal in this case. What do you think now Obama, are the police just acting stupidly in this incident too? If Mr. Zimmerman's story of acting in self-defense, the media, and the President are going to look mighty incompetent, again!
My advice to the San Diego city fathers, take a trip to Dearborn, Michigan, take a look at what once was a beautiful lakeside community, that has now become a Muslim Ghetto. In ten years, San Diego will look very similar.
God Help Us