SOTU: Obama wants government power consolidated under Executive Branch – Glenn Beck
Thanks to Glenn Beck and his keen ear, the most important and frightening statement from Barack Obama may have been lost in the rest of Obama's deceptive rhetoric, of the State of the Union address.
I must confess that I did not watch or listen to Obama's latest State of the Union Lies Speech. I have very good reasons for not watching or listening. Number one, the sight of Obama's smug mug makes me want to throw up, number two, the sound of his voice and his incessant lying also makes me want to throw up. Had I listened to the SOTU speech, I assure you I would have written this blog article yesterday. Glenn Beck and I don't always see eye to eye on everything, but concerning this matter, I am glad Glenn heard, saw it and brought it to the attention of all who do listen to him.
I have written many times about how, in my opinion Barack Obama will not be willing to give up the controls without a fight, or without some diabolical way of retaining the reins.
I believe his statement regarding changes he wants to make to the structure of the Constitution concerning the Executive Branch of government, lends credence to my concerns. (Before you get all excited, his intentions have nothing to do with his immediate resignation, or that he promises to never again usurp Congressional and Judicial power by use of his Executive Orders). Quite the contrary. Barack Obama would like to see a more efficient bureaucracy, and wouldn't we all? The difference however, is Obama just wants more power to get things done at his command, his order, and be able to skirt the Constitutional way of doing things, you know, with checks and balances. Obama's exact words were: "The executive branch also needs to change. Too often, it's inefficient, outdated and remote. That's why I've asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people." Doesn't that sound wonderful? Wow, a Government more responsive to the needs of the American people!!! This guy is Grrrreat!!! Not so much..., not so fast either! Why don't we take a moment and parse that statement? "The executive branch also needs to change. Too often it is inefficient, outdated and remote." What Obama meant was this, I am inefficient because I can't dictate orders, outdated, because the Constitution stops me from exacting supreme and sovereign power over the people and their elected representatives, and by remote, he simply means I need to be able to dictate and have my orders carried out while I'm on the golf course in Hawaii. Next sentence: That's why I've asked this Congress to grant "me" the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people." What Obama meant was, give me the sole power over all branches of Government, and I will decide what is best for the American people, and I won't have to ask their permission or yours to implement my plans, orders and agenda. To sum it all up, he, in not so many words has asked permission from legislative branch to make him "Dictator of America", perhaps the world. What do I mean by the world? Let me throw out some points to ponder. How many dictators are still in power in the world? Why aren't there very many? Do you really think that the few dictators left in the world will be in power much longer? Who was the most instrumental leader responsible for the overthrow of practically every dictator in the Middle East and North Africa? How many nations are in virtual total upheaval financially? Why? Why, just recently, did George Soros predict the collapse of the American dollar, and say there would be bloodshed and riots in the streets? Does he know something we don't know? Do the names Barack Hussein Obama and George Soros keep popping up, as you try to answer these questions, well congratulations, they keep popping up in my analysis too.
Given these points, it will not surprise me if our useless, gutless and Godless Congress gives Obama what he is asking for, supreme power, over all branches of government. In essence his dictatorship. Now, understand this will not happen right away. However, when it gets close to election time, and things are not really looking up for Obama in a free and fair re-election... You may actually see the Obama dictatorship at work. Executive orders will be flying off the Lincoln desk faster than you can say "what constitution"? I caution you, if the people decide not to re-elect Obama, Obama may decide there is no need for an election, not in 2012 and not ever again. Do not expect your elected representatives to stop this man from taking over. They have made no attempt to stop his shredding and usurpation of the Constitution so far, and there is no reason to expect that they suddenly find courage in the near future. The legislators who are not already on the Obama band wagon, except for a few, are nothing but a crowd of empty suits. Regardless of what promises they made to get elected two years ago, they will not be willing to stand against Obama. To steal a phrase from Sitting Bull, "there was no iron in their words."
This nation needs prayer my friends, and preparation, we do in fact have a long and arduous journey ahead of us, make no mistake about it!
God Help Us
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
|Sick, Twisted, Demented, Delusional|
Attempting to find a modicum of logic in Obama's thought processes has proven a more difficult task than I expected. I understand that the Supreme Court, in their Godless and gutless way of determining a decision or actually not determining a decision in Roe vs Wade has rendered it possible for infanticide to continue in this country. However, I fail to see anywhere in the U.S. Constitution a "fundamental right" to murder the unborn citizens of this nation.
Exactly Mr. President, what are these rights, freedoms and opportunities our nation's daughters do not have, as opposed to our nation's sons? I am 63 years of age, and when I was younger, I admit that opportunities for females as opposed to males was one sided. Things have changed dramatically since the 50's, 60's and 70's, however. So, I can only determine that the last single right you want to see placed on an equal basis, is the right to murder the unwanted. There is no such right Mr. President. Murder of the innocent is murder in it's most heinous form.
I remember you said, "that you wouldn't want your daughter being punished by carrying and giving birth to an unwanted child." In essence, you're saying that a child if it's unwanted should be killed. Your mind is in serious collapse if that makes perfect sense to you. You, Mr. President are suffering from a very dangerous form of dementia if you are able to equate women's rights to the slaughter of innocents as if they are somehow logically related. I'm trying to figure out the logic of your thinking Mr. President when you make it a crime to "water board" a terrorist, but find no fault or problem with the tearing and pulling out an unborn baby from the womb piece by piece. You seem to actually revel in the fact that this heinous act is somehow helping women. I ask, helping them in what way? Do you honestly think that these mostly young women will have no remorse after an abortion? Do you actually think that these young women will not be scarred for life. Do you actually think that that baby being murdered in the womb shouldn't have a chance to be born, grow up, and maybe become President of the United States. Are you Mr. President saying that the last baby to ever be allowed to live should have been you, or Malia or Sasha. Can you see how twisted that line of thought is? Mr. President, is it your conclusion that the unborn baby is responsible for some type of punishment, just because it exists? In your sick way of analysing unwanted pregnancy, do you relieve all responsibility from the father and the mother? Has this human fetus in your mind, somehow transformed from a miracle of God to a parasite? I wonder if you would be willing to take your daughters and your wife to an abortion clinic or hospital and stand in the operating room and witness the procedure of an abortion, or better yet a partial birth abortion? Could you come away with the same cold attitude, that murdering babies is a better option than giving birth?
In my opinion, it is Barack Obama's attitude toward abortion that explains his attitude toward everything else. Is it any wonder that a man who believes that a baby is a punishment, also believes that it is everyone else's fault that he has failed as President. The President's attitude toward blame, puts him in the same category of the other mentally flawed, like Adolf Hitler who blamed the Jews and Christians for the ills of the world, or Chairman Mao who mass murdered thousands of Chinese, because in his mind, there were so many Chinese that nobody would miss several hundred thousand.
Barack Hussein Obama is the most dangerous, diabolical and demented President of this century. Given enough time, his twisted way of seeing things will become law in this nation. It is a sad state of affairs when a choice between our President and anyone else, it becomes imperative that the people choose "anyone else". If there is a free and fair election in 2012, it will be America's last chance for survival. Obama must be relieved of command, and as much of his past influence must be erased and expunged from the land. As before, I caution you, do not expect Obama to relinquish the reins easily or without a fight. A man as sick, twisted, demented and delusional as he is, will, if he finds it necessary, find a way to retain control. Watch for it.
God Help Us