Saturday, January 22, 2011


"It's not the Law, it's the audacity in the assumption that Morality can and should be legislated. Thereby allowing judges to adjudicate the right of life and death. The problem with trying to legislate morality, is that by doing so, you run the risk of unavoidable consequences such as, the legislating of Immorality. The morality of Laws, is a direct reflection of the morality of the law maker." (Jerome F. Roth)
There is only one true law maker, and that is God, the Creator, the One who gave Moses the Ten Commandments. If the legislators of all nations consulted the Ten Commandments prior to legislating a new law, it would be most beneficial, both to the legislative body and the people of the nation they represent. In my mind, the Ten Commandments are the moral laws given to the human race by God, so that we as mere humans wouldn't have to legislate morality, through the Commandments, God has done it for us. Throughout time in memoriam, the Ten Commandments set the parameters of what is good and bad, right and wrong. Teaching the Ten Commandments to our children, as we were taught will give them a guideline to live by. Re- posting them in all school classrooms and government buildings would serve as a reminder to all who read them what the Creator expects of them. For the past 30 years, our children have been learning self-esteem, but not learning that esteem must be earned. They have been taught that there won't be consequences to their actions. The reality of the world is, there are losers and winners, trying does not make a winner, success is not measured by trying, it is measured by success. God gave all of us a gift, some will be gifted in sports, not everyone who tries sports will be winners, some will lose, that is reality. Giving the same reward for trying, demeans the winner. It is from losing that we gain strength to try harder, from losing we realize potential, or the lack there of. From losing we find our way to other endeavors. If a child is not allowed to lose and face disappointment, he can not be expected to overcome and try again. The losers of today, if guided, will be the winners of tomorrow.
First of all, our children must be allowed to be born. This is a moral decision, and it is one the mother must make. A baby is a gift from God. Abortion is the murder of an innocent. Abortion is a moral issue, it can not be legislated. The result of Roe vs Wade does not demand by law that a mother must submit to abortion. The law is not to blame, the judges are not to blame, the doctors are not to blame, the blame falls squarely on the moral conviction of the mother, and those who surround her. It is the degradation of moral conviction in all those involved. In a sense, all hold equal responsibility in slaughter of these innocents. Regardless of guidance, the decision is the mother's. One day, when this nation comes to it's senses, abortion may be made illegal in all 50 states. Then and only then is the decision made for the mother. One thing must be fully understood, there is NO law on the books today that require a mother to walk into an abortion clinic and get an abortion. Morality is taught by the family from young on. The morality of adults in America can control what students are taught in school, and they can control what is legislated in congress and adjudicated in the courts. They can do this by paying attention to what is happening around them. This country, at least for the time being is still a country of, by and for the people. Morality can not be legislated, it can only be taught. It is the responsibility of every parent to make sure that their morals are reflected in the government, the schools and at home.
"A nation that kills it's own children, is a nation without hope." (Pope John Paul II)
"To legislate morality, you legislate immorality at the same time with the same law." (Jerome F. Roth)
God Help Us
"The Watchman"
Ulla Tempore' Ullo Situ

Friday, January 21, 2011


Is it really necessary for Black Americans to have their own TEA Party? What's the compulsion to have a TEA Party designated "The Black Tea Party"? Would Martin Luther King Jr. have started a Black TEA Party? I honestly don't think he would, nor would he have condoned one.
As a proud and active TEA Party member in the county where I live, and as a guest speaker from last April 15th TEA Party, it troubles me to see and hear that Black Americans find it somehow necessary to have a TEA Party to call their own. I have attended several TEA Party rallies, and none of them were designated as "White TEA Parties". In actuality, all of the rallies I attended were open to all patriots regardless or skin color or nationality. As far as I know, there has been NO racism or discrimination at any TEA Party rally in the entire United States. So why is there now a "Black TEA Party"?
For Martin Luther King, it was his dream and his life's work to bring Blacks and Whites and all colors to a point of unification and equality. Since his death however, it appears that the Black community, or at least the Black community leaders have this desire to separate Blacks from Whites. Fifty years ago, I could understand the need for Black people to have organizations and programs of their, as for so long, Blacks were denied any chance at pride in their race. But that is changed now, it has been changed since the late sixties. Today there are equal opportunities for all Americans, regardless of color. So why this incessant need to be set apart, Blacks from Whites? I hear the leaders of Black communities constantly touting the life and accomplishments of MLK Jr., but these leaders are not willing to allow the races to be unified as was MLK Jr.'s dream. Are they afraid to let go of their victim status? If there is a "Black TEA Party", I caution all Black people involved to be vigilant of exploitation by those who founded the program.
It is my considered opinion, right or wrong, that there is no need to have two TEA Parties, one Black and the other for everyone else. Designators like Black and White being used for a joint effort, are divisive at best. The TEA Party movement was started as an outlet and a platform for all Americans to have their voices heard. It still is, no one has ever been excluded. The TEA Party was extremely successful in this past election, dividing Black TEA Partiers from Whites, will not make the movement stronger. The American TEA Party was established as a grass roots movement, and there were no racial overtones, all people were and are welcome to participate, no one was or is excluded, or had any reason to feel excluded. Today's TEA Party is the same now, as when it began. So why start a TEA Party with an exclusive, divisive skin color designator? Does the Black patriot have a reason to be called Black, is being referred to as a patriot not enough? It makes me cautious and even a little suspicious of the motivation behind a "Black", or "White" anything, and that includes a "Black TEA Party. It makes me wonder if there isn't a scheme to divide the TEA Party, to keep America's patriots separated, to weaken the movement. Racial discrimination works in America, and the Progressives know it. What better way to bring down the TEA Party, than to racially segregate it? The Progressives in charge, are not going to give up their quest to control us all. It is imperative that we remain united in our efforts to combat the Socialism that's being forced down our throats. We cannot successfully combat Socialism, if we are divided by color, by race, or by religious persuasion. We are all Americans first and foremost, and we must unify, or we will fall to the Progressives one movement, one group at a time. "We The People", means all the people. Our founding fathers did not place a color or race designator in the Declaration of Independence, and neither should we! We are Americans all, we are beyond the petty differences between the races, and we as Americans must let those differences go, they are from the past! These differences must not be carried forward into this political combat, as they alone can and will defeat us. We can only survive if we as a population of "Americans" take a stand for our liberty and freedom, and we must stand as one unified voice!!! The survival of our Republic depends on it!!!
God Help Us
"The Watchman"
Ulla Tempore' Ullo Situ

Wednesday, January 19, 2011


NAACP, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson
What do these three have in common?

ANSWER: They all profit from the proliferation of racism.

It is the constant proliferation of racism that allows Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the NAACP to make a profit. Without racism these three would all just slip away into the the national archives, never to be heard from again. All three have become proficient at the exploitation of their own race. Keeping Black Americans in a victim state of mind, is what pays off big to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Both of these so-called warriors for the rights of the down trodden spend more time creating dissent than they do quelling and finding solutions for it. There is no money to be made if there is peaceful discourse between the races. Both of these gentlemen have hitched a ride on the coat tails of Martin Luther King Jr. The truth of the matter is, neither one these guys can hold a candle to MLK, and neither of them would like to see MLK's dream come true. The longer Black Americans and White Americans are kept at odds, the longer leeches like Sharpton and Jackson will be able to be profiteers from their own race. You will notice, that I chose not to use the term African-American, just as I chose not to refer to myself as a Polish-German-Irish-American. If one feels the urge to distinguish themselves from other Americans, then lets do it by the obvious, I am a Caucasian American, and if you are black, then you are a Black American. Regardless of how you take it, if you were born in America, and I was born in America, we are consequently both "Americans", and there is no need to be hyphenated. With that opinion, I am sure that the Sharptons and the Jacksons of this country would surely brand me a "racist", and if that's what they want to call me, then I will proudly wear the title, I mean, why fight it? Either way, if I'm White, I'll be wrong! Take the authenticity of one Reverend Al Sharpton: He has never received any formal Bible education at any accredited Christian seminary. Believe it or not, he was somehow ordained a Pentecostal Minister at the age of 9 or 10. In the '70's he was re-baptised as a Baptist and miraculously accepted as a Baptist Minister, also without any formal education. His background as a divisive character is well known. His use of racial slurs when speaking about white people, Jews, Catholics and Mormons are also well known. How about the infamous Reverend Jesse Jackson: He dropped out of the Chicago Theological Seminary in 1966 without earning a degree of any kind. However he too was ordained without a degree and received an Honorary Doctorate from Chicago Theological Seminary, but not until 1990. Just so you understand, an Honorary Degree is NOT earned, but bestowed, and carries very little actual weight in academic circles. In 2000, Jesse Jackson was also given (given) a Masters of Divinity Degree based on his few and paltry past credits and life experience. In other words he actually has no credentials at all. The bottom line here is this, the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson are not very reverend. As a matter of fact, as far as divinity goes, they are both "Frauds Cum Laude." Let's talk for a moment about the NAACP: At the bottom of almost any controversy surrounding a racial, especially black and white situation, you will find the NAACP is at the head of the class of this class warfare. In the picture above, you will see the "State House" in Columbia, SC.. This is a photo of the MLK Day Observance, notice the statue behind the box. That's correct, it is a bronze of George Washington, and it is blatantly boxed in and hidden from the view of all celebration attendees. Why you ask? According to NAACP spokespeople, they were not hiding George Washington, but just building a backdrop behind the podium, and well the backdrop just happened to hide the Father of our Country Statue. According to NAACP folks, there was nothing political about it. It is, and has always been the intent of the NAACP to make these subtle nuances toward racism and then casually attempt to explain them away. The truth of the matter is this; the NAACP is supposedly for the Advancement Of Colored People, but in actuality they become irrelevant if colored people advance. If the NAACP was in favor of the advancement of colored people, they wouldn't be trying to incite animosity all the time. The NAACP has an uncanny way of making their members feel as though white people are somehow causing black people to falter. Actually it is the actions of the NAACP that are keeping Black people down and in an "I'm the victim state". The NAACP needs victims, and they thrive on keeping up the facade of Black victimization by White people. The NAACP may well be the most racist organization in America since the Klan. Their bias is well documented. If a crime is perpetrated on Blacks, the NAACP is right there to condemn the perpetrator, even if they don't know who the perpetrator is. They will assume the criminal is a White. If it is proven that the perpetrator is not White, but Black, there will be no apology by the NAACP. They will just fade back into the shadows, as if nothing was said and no crime had taken place. It should also be noted that the NAACP's position on abortion is "no position at all". Even though there are 43 million babies aborted (murdered) every year, and 1/3 of them are Black babies, the NAACP takes no stance, and they backed Barack Obama (the pro abortion candidate) for President. Why do you think they backed Barack Obama for President? Because they think he's Black, that is the only reason. Suffice to say, the NAACP, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are as racist as they come. I would venture to say that there are many, many more Black people who are racist than there are Whites in America today. And that is because they are being urged to be racist by racist organizations.

Let's talk about reverse discrimination. How many All Black Colleges in America? At last count well over 30. How many All White Colleges in America? 0. Should there be any all Black or all White colleges in America? NO. Is that proof of reverse discrimination? Not the colleges alone, but there is more: The United Negro College Fund, Miss Black America Pageant, NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), The Black Caucus, The Black Athletes of America. Are these organizations considered racist, or racially biased, actually according to today's politically correct standards NO. Well, I beg to differ. I ask you, what if there was established a United White College Fund or how about the Miss White America Pageant. Perhaps a NAAWP (National Association for the Advancement of White People), or the White Caucus and finally the The White Athletes of America organization. Would they be considered racist or racially biased, the answer to that is: YES. My question for you is, why?

These are points to ponder from,

The Watchman

Monday, January 17, 2011


To the left, we have U.S. Congressman Al Green (D) from Texas. Rep. Green has introduced a Bill to Congress that will afford temporary protection to illegal Pakistani aliens. To the right, we have a picture that explains why!!!

It comes as no surprise that it would be Texas Representative Al Green who would introduce a Bill to grant temporary protection to illegal Pakistanis here in America. From the picture above right, it appears that the Pakistani population supported Al Green in his run for U.S. Congress, and this is some kind of pay back for their support. I mean, if President Obama can break the laws of bribery and shred the constitution in order to repay his supporters, why not Al Green? Never mind the fact that well.....they are illegal, and do we know exactly how many of them there are, and or how did they get here in the first place? Could they have sneaked across our southern border with Mexico? You know the border that's so secure according to Janet Napolitano. I really can't help but ask; just how temporary is temporary protection? After all, 75% of the illegal Mexican aliens in America were once supposedly temporary migrant workers who just happened to lose their sense of direction when it came time to go home. So their temporary status is now what? Permanent??? Who knows??? Are American citizens going to be encouraged to learn a new phrase, something like "Permanent Illegal Alien", that of course would encompass all illegals from where-ever, regardless of how they managed to creep into this country.

America has always been the most benevolent country on the planet, so we created special laws for special situations. For instance America has in the past granted temporary asylum to immigrants (legal) from war torn countries, especially countries that we have contributed to their internal upheaval. One must remember however, these immigrants were officially invited guests of the United States, they weren't interlopers. Many of them were allowed to remain, they assimilated, and studied, learned the English language, and became productive citizens. The thing thats sets these invited guests apart from illegals is, the fact that any person or persons from another country deem it necessary to sneak into this country under the cover of night, tells me that they are already intent on breaking our laws, in retrospect, they already did, the moment they crossed our border without permission. I don't care where you come from, if you are in America illegally, then you have already knowingly committed a crime, and in my mind, you would not hesitate to commit another crime in order to maintain you present status. That makes you unwelcome!!

Let's keep in mind, before you call me a racist, these Pakistanis are of the Muslim faith. Also remember that Pakistani Muslim men are partial to child brides, but they aren't partial to the nationality of their child bride, or parental permission. Also a point to ponder, as the good and peaceful members of the Islamic faith, they also have a healthy and blatant disregard for women's rights, especially brides. These Muslim peace lovers are not adverse to the practice of beating their wives into submission. A fair warning, keep hold of your young daughters if you live in a neighborhood of illegal Pakistanis, because as soon as word gets out that they have been granted temporary protection, they will not hesitate to come forward and begin making demands on the neighborhood. One thing you can count on when dealing with Muslims, especially ones that are somehow protected, is that they will become bold, outspoken and extremely demanding. Don't believe me, wait and see, you won't have to take my word for it for very long.

If you have a Congressman or Senator, now would be a good time to make a call to his or her office, and try to stop this suicidal, insane, temporary protection Bill from passing. Hind sight is always 20/20, you have been alerted. Make the call, send the email, write the letter, it may be too late to write the letter.

God Help Us

Sincerely, "The Watchman"

Ulla Tempore' Ullo Situ