Friday, February 3, 2012


The Reverend Obama Presiding Over the National Prayer Breakfast Feb. 2012

Jesus would want us to tax the wealthy.  After all, did Jesus not tell his disciples to "sell all they have and then give to the poor?"  Did Jesus not say " for unto whom much is given, much shall be required."?  (Don't you just love it when someone whose entire knowledge of the Holy Bible, comes from some atheist hack speech writer who loaded it in the teleprompter, starts quoting scripture?)  Well, that is exactly what Obama did yesterday morning as he presided over a National Prayer Breakfast.  Once again he professed himself to be a Christian, at the same time supporting the murder of thousands of innocent unborn babies.  He pretends to be a Christian while at the same time, he is mandating that the Catholic Church abandon it's principles and it's religious beliefs regarding contraception and abortion.  He professes to be a Christian, while at the same time he praises Islam and Muhammad, and vilifies the Christians and Jews around the globe, and in his own country.
  Obama said this:  When I talk about shared responsibility, it's because I genuinely believe that in a time when many folks are struggling and at a time when we have enormous deficits, (who caused those enormous deficits?  No, it wasn't G.W. Bush!)  it's hard for me to ask seniors on fixed income or young people with student loans or middle-class families who can barely pay the bills to shoulder the burden alone."   Really???  Now I can understand seniors on fixed income having a problem, but young people with student loans not shouldering their responsibility, there, I see a problem.  When I borrowed, I paid back, all of it, with interest to boot.  When I see that in my own state of Tennessee there are literally hundreds of unpaid student loans from people who graduated college years ago, I just get angry.  The worst part is that many of these unpaid student loans are from doctors and dentists who practice medicine and earn upwards of $200,000.00 a year, live in huge homes and still owe the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars.  I apologise for the rant, and beg your indulgence.  Back to Obama the hypocrite.  Obama continued his speech with the following:  "And I think to myself, if I'm willing to give something up as somebody who's been extraordinarily blessed and give up some tax breaks that I enjoy, I actually think that's going to make some economic sense."  (Now there's a hypocritical statement if ever I've heard one.  The Obama administration villifies men like Mitt Romney because he's been financially successful, without mentioning that Mitt Romey over the years, has given 15% of his income to charity and tithes to his church.  I guess Barack forgot to mention that he and Michelle gave all of 1% (one) to charity, according to their tax returns.  Maybe they have good excuses, like greens fees have gone up, or I had to pay for those $1000.00 shoes?  
  Just between me and you Barack, when Jesus told his disciples to sell all they have, he didn't say give the proceeds to Ceasar, did he?  No, he said and give to the poor.  When Jesus said "for unto whom much is given, much shall be required."  He wasn't saying that wealthy people should pay more in taxes.  He was saying that God has blessed you greatly, and you should share your grest blessings.  Jesus wasn't telling the government to tax the wealthy till they bleed, and then chose to whom the money should go.  Somehow I seriously doubt that Jesus would be in favor of taxing the rich so that the government could squander the money on useless projects, i.e., Solyndra for example.
  You can refer to Barack Obama any way you'd like.  I prefer Hypocrite and Chief, Liar and Thief, or even Traitor to His Nation.  In my opinion, this president is an apostate of Satan himself, and he surrounds himself with like men and women.  George Soros, Nancy Pelosi, Valerie Jarrett, Harry Reid, Eric Holder, William Ayers, and a host of others, all of whom I feel must already owe their souls to the devil.  
  Four more years of this White House demon, and our nation will not be recognizable to us and the world.  If we as Christians ever had a second chance, it will be the upcoming 2012 presidential election.  I pray we take this blessing from God, and use it to help turn this nation back into the Christian principled nation it once was.
God Help Us
The Watchman   

Thursday, February 2, 2012



Just like pulling weeds from the garden??? 
  Certainly, we're at the threshold of a new and frightening lack of morality and it's lacking in Bio-Ethics.  After the things I've read, it appears to me that there are few ethics left in the study of bio-ethics.

  When one considers that the word "ethic" commonly has the definition "a principle of right or good conduct or a body of such principles."  I would have thought it safe to assume that the term "Bio-ethic" would be related to something good and moral, it appears my assumption was/is wrong.  The science of the study of Bio-ethics can be quite immoral, or void of morality all together.

  How many of us have ever heard of the "The Dead Donor Rule"?  Not many I assure you.  Allow me to back up a couple steps. 
  Two bioethicists, one from Duke University and another from the National Institute of Health have brought up the question "What makes killing wrong?"  Utilizing their definition of killing, these to men conclude if the person is "universally and irreversibly disabled" and has "no abilities to lose" then killing that person in order to harvest their organs to possibly save the lives of others, should not be considered morally wrong.  Walter Sinnot Miller, professor of ethics at (Duke) and Franklin Miller from the NIH Department of Bioethics have made this statement:  "What makes an act of killing morally wrong is not that the act causes loss of life or consciousness but rather that the act causes loss of all remaining abilities."  It is their argument that if no abilities remain then the "dead donor rule," which is the ethical practice that a person must be declared dead before removing vital organs, should apply to patients whose hearts have stopped and are being removed from a respirator.  Currently, under the "Dead Donor Rule" patients who are not brain-dead but who are undergoing and orchestrated withdrawal of life support are monitored for the onset of cardiac arrest.  In typical protocols, patients are pronounced dead 2-5 minutes after the onset of asystole (on the basic of cardiac criteria), and then their organs are removed as quickly as possible for transplantation.  One small problem, nearly everyone agrees that many patients could be resuscitated after an interval of 2 to 5 minutes, advocates of this approach to donation say that these patients can be regarded as dead because a decision has been made not to attempt resuscitation. 
  "The "Dead Donor Rule" is routinely violated in the contemporary practice of vital organ donation.  If traditional medical ethics were applied, this type of vital organ donation would have to cease immediately."  This outcome would, however, be extremely harmful and unreasonable from an ethical point of view [because patients who could be saved will die].  In other words there are two ethical points, if one is violated, the other suffers the consequences, and vice-versa.  That puts the medical community and the organ donation program in quite the pickle.  Curtailing the the vital organ donation harvesting practice would result in a severe reduction of vital organ transplants.  The bottom line question as I see it, is this question:  Is a person dead when his heart stops, or when his brain ceases to function?  Morally, in my opinion of course, a person should not be declared dead unless both heart and brain function have stopped.  However the absence of any brain function for a reasonably extended period of time might also be considered death, but that becomes a very serious ethical question.  That, being said is my opinion, these two bioethicists have a different idea, they wish to remove "pickle" by simply obviating what is now the norm against killing.  They put it this way:  "If killing were wrong just because it is causing death or the loss of life, then the same principle would apply with the same strength to pulling weeds out of a garden.  If it is not immoral to weed a garden, then life as such cannot really be sacred, and killing as such cannot be morally wrong." 
  In my opinion, both of these guys need to be straight-jacketed and put away for a long long time.  Killing is morally wrong, both from a religious stand point, and yes, from an ethical stand point.  Just because science is not happy with the stigma of being called killers for harvesting organs too soon, doesn't give them the right to basically change the definition of killing.  Killing is killing regardless of what you change it's definition to.  Once again I am taken back to a quote from C.S. Lewis.  "One can no more deny the existence of God, than a lunatic can put out the sun by scrawling the word darkness on the walls of his cell."  I hope I remembered that quote correctly, if not we'll call it paraphrase and I will assume that you understand the gist of what I am trying to convey.
   Due to the amount of legal scrutiny in the West, i.e., America, and Canada and other civilized countries like the UK.  The amount of organ donations have been quite limited, which of course explains why so many transplant patients die while still on the waiting list for a donor match, especially in the kidney category.  This of course results in the propagation of another very serious ethical matter.  This story goes even deeper and grows more disgusting.  It has been reported in the Daily Mail that women in the Ukraine are being paid to get pregnant and have abortions to create stem cells for use in "beauty treatments"; the BBC reported the practice might even include infanticide.  Poor women in India are renting their wombs to rich women for gestation, and some Westerners are buying Indian IVF embryos because it is cheaper than having them made at home.  (The above information was taken from an article written by Wesley J. Smith.  His article titled "TECHNOLOGICAL MORALITY was published in the National Review Online January 8, 2010)  (Other information can be attributed to "The Blaze" and written by Liz Kilmas on January 30, 2012)
  The world today is faced with many ethical questions, as science makes huge strides and medicine becomes more exact.  It is important to remember the moral aspect of ethics, which is sometimes abandoned in the name of expediency.  We have a moral obligation to question the ethics of science and medicine as well as a legal obligation, to try and stop things that well....just don't feel right.  God, is our refuge and our strength, He has also provided a guide for our moral direction.  That guide is the Holy Bible, and prayer for guidance from the Lord in all things will guide us, as well the scientists stay on the narrow path.  I urge everyone to seek the Lord's guidance in everything we do.  I urge prayer for Doctors and Scientists and Ethicists that they would also seek the Lord's guidance.  "Morality is the core of what keeps ethics, ethical."
  One more thing:  If you have a living will, you may want to stipulate that you'd like to be resuscitated at least once, prior to letting them you go.  Just a thought...
God Help Us
The Watchman

Sunday, January 29, 2012


The Army calls it diversity, I call it feeding the Satan
  Because the United States Army allocated $50,000.00 toward a Christian based concert in 2010, military Atheists were offended, so now the Army in their infinite wisdom has decided to allocate another $50,000.00 so that the Atheists won't feel left out.  On March 31, 2012 Fort Bragg, NC. will host the first ever "Rock Beyond Belief" a rock concert for non-believers.   Is this the Army's exercise in diversity plan, or is it an exercise in futility?  What's the next taxpayer funded rock concert going to be for?  Your guess is as good as mine.
  As a general practice, I have no objections to the military providing entertainment to our soldiers, after all, they deserve something for their dedication, don't they?  My concern is the direction that the Army is taking this whole entertainment and appeasment thing.  Last year it was a Christian concert, in 2012 it's this Atheist concert, will the taxpayers be paying for a $50,000.00 Homosexual rock concert later this year or in 2013?  Worse yet, will it end there?  Somehow, I see this going way beyond the $150,000.00 level.  Hey, we're talking about an endless supply of taxpayer funds, right?  Didn't I just here that the military was to be cutting it's budget to the bone, so that Obama could spend the money elsewhere?  There must be another Solyndra out there somewhere!  I suppose I'm just talking about wasting money here, but I believe there is much more to this newly found diverse military issue, and it isn't good.
  I know what goes on at Christian rock concerts, songs about brotherly love, songs that worship our Lord.  Guest speakers who preach from the Bible and give testimony to the soldiers that lift their spirit, giving hope and understanding, promoting camaraderie, and love.  Christian concerts are family friendly and appropriate for audiences of all ages.  Although, I've been to a couple of Christian churches where Christian rock was being played, and I left with a head ache more than anything else, but the theme was the same, Love, Hope, Peace and God's Grace.
  It is this Army Atheist rock concert that troubles me.  It doesn't appear to be targeted toward non-believers as much is it is targeted toward Satan worship and hatred of Christians and Jews.  The headline rock band for this Fort Bragg concert is a group called "Aiden".  Aiden has a song called "Hysteria", this song has been dubbed the Atheist Anthem."  The lyrics are extremely troubling, and the music video with it, is equalling troubling, to say the least.  The video contains images of burning churches and a bloodied crosses.  Here are the song lyrics, you decide:
                            Love how they burn your synagogues
                            Love how they torch your holy books
                            Filling coffers with your grief
                            Filling coffins with your misery
                            Faith holding outright criminals safe
                            This is just the world we live in
                            Can you justify the pain
                            The death of fiction will save us all.
  This Fort Bragg concert is also billed as family friendly, who's family would that be?  Still not convinced of the Satanic influence in this concert?  Here are some lyrics from Aiden's song called "Crusifiction".
           "Let me give you a little inside information about God
                 He's laughing his sick fu**ing a** off
                 He's a tight a**
                 He's a sadist
                 Worship that???
             F**k your God
             F**k your faith in the end
                 There's no religion."
  According to Justin Griffith, the Atheist concert organizer, this latter song will not be played at the concert.  That certainly makes me feel better about the whole thing, how about you?  Just how does he expect to prevent the playing of that song, anyway?
  In my opinion, this is NOT a concert for Atheists, it is a concert that is intended to promote hatred of Christians and Jews and all that we believe in.  It is a concert that literally invites evil into the midst of concert goers, and will result in a military condoned discrimination of Christians and Jews should it be allowed to go on.  This so-called Atheist concert is nothing but a ruse to allow Satan worship in the military of the United States.  I know some folks who profess to be Atheists.  I do not here them using profane and offensive language toward those who do believe.  The Atheists I am familiar with do not hate Christians and Jews, they just choose not to believe.  As ironic as it may sound, that is their God given right.  I'm sure that Atheists can have a conert that promotes Atheism without promoting hate towards those who do believe.  It is no coincidence that people without God have a propencity towards anger and hatred and even violence.  This Fort Bragg concert will be a monumental mistake if allowed to move forward.  Doesn't the Army see that this is a move toward the tolerance of evil among the ranks?  I can see no good coming from this particular concert, only an increase in the mal-adjusted.  I'm not talking about the Atheist, I'm talking about those who already hate Christians and Jews and are looking for an outlet and a justification for that hate.  Here, the United States Army is providing a platform for hate, and those apostates of Satan will surely take advantage of this platform. 
  When did the Generals lose sight of the need for cohesivness in military units?  Putting on a concert such as this will do nothing but degrade the cohesion.  To what extent will the military go to be politically correct?  Will the growth of hatred  that concerts like this bring about, continue to grow among the ranks until the Christians and Jews decide they're getting out?  When that happens, will the military be left devoid of any morality?  Will those that are left become Satan's Army?  The degradation and corruption of our legislature, courts and executive branches of government is spilling into the ranks of our military.  When promoters of evil can demand equal time as those who promote peace and love, and get it, there are some real serious issues in the Pentagon.  Evil is something that can not and should not be tolerated at any level, yet it is not only being tolerated, but encouraged.  Evil, also can not be ignored, as it will not go away.  Evil must be rebuked and destroyed in Jesus' name, or it will proliferate. 
  I can't help but believe that this encouragement of Paganism and Satanism among the ranks of our military is the beginning of the end of America's moral compass, and another proof that America, under this administration is making marked strides toward an evil government that will, in the end, make the reign of Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot look like the good life.  The American people are accepting lies from our President and congress as though they are truth.  The American people are standing in line to become useful idiots of the masters of deception, even though the Bible has been warning us about this for centuries.  This one concert is just the beginning of the recruitment into Satan's army.  It won't stop here, unless it is stopped here.
  Christians and Jews, prepare yourselves for a long and arduous journey.  Evil is becoming a dominant force in the free world.  The new Dark Age is coming.
God Help Us
The Watchman