IF YOU FAIL TO GET THE RIGHT ANSWERS, IT'S BEACUSE YOU'RE ASKING THE WRONG QUESTION!!

All smiles from the two most ruthless and diabolical politicians in America, if not the world.

    First of all, I am extremely proud of the State Department's "whistle blowers" for the statements made at yesterday's Benghazi hearing.  Mark Thompson, Greg Hicks and Eric Nordstrom epitomize what it means to be true Americans, and I salute them!

  I was unable to watch the hearing, but I have perused a number of play by play and blow by blows to see that the testimony is at the very least, damning to Obama's administration and Hillary's State Department.  The obvious decisions that were made in this tragic debacle place the blame squarely on the shoulders of President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.  It won't stop there, as there is still plenty of blame to be spread around to folks like Leon Panetta and General Dempsey and numerous other cover-up conspirators.  It's going to be a long road before this buck stops.  The Obama administration wreaks of treachery and guilt from the White House through the Obama cabinet, and onward down through the military ranks and even into the left wing Progressive Senate.  It concerns me, that even if Obama and Hillary Clinton gave orders for rescue personnel to "stand down", that at least one of the military officers would have recognized an unlawful and immoral order when he/she saw it.  But no, not this time.  The only truly brave personnel in this Benghazi incident are all dead now.  Which brings me to a few accusations of my own.

  There are two people who should be standing before the American people, clothed in hand and leg irons answering the questions.  Those two are Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton.  In my heart of hearts, I do not see that this will ever happen, and I am saddened about it.  If the two who are unmistakably responsible, are not made to face a court made up of the American people, then truly it will stand as proof of how deeply and irreversibly corrupt our government has come to be. 

  The summary of reports on the hearings yesterday all seem to point to the same basis of questioning.  "Why did Obama and Hillary leave innocent Americans swinging in the wind, knowing full well that the eventual outcome of this barbaric Muslim attack would be certain death to those left to fend for themselves?"   That, of course is a good question, and deserves to be answered.  In my opinion however, that isn't the only pertinent correct question.  My questions are ones that didn't appear to come up during the hearing, or at least I do not see them as "asked and answered" in any of the hearing accounts I've read this morning.  My questions are as follows:  1)  " What was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi in the first place?  2)Wasn't Benghazi deemed so dangerous that numerous other consulates were closed and even the Red Cross closed their offices several days prior to that fateful day September 11, 2012? 3) According to the U.S. State Department website, there is no "consulate" in Benghazi, never has been, so again, why was Ambassador Stevens sent to Benghazi? 4) Isn't it true that the alleged "consulate" was actually a CIA rented villa for the sole purpose of carrying out covert operations?  5) Weren't these CIA covert operations directly connected to Presidential/State Department orders given to facilitate the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian rebels, through a yet to be determined third party? 6) Was Ambassador Stevens there to supervise the transfer of this cache of weapons, on orders from the White House and Secretary of State?  7) Was Benghazi chosen for this covert weapons transfer because of it's remote and dangerous location? 8) Is it because Ambassador Stevens was under secret orders, and in order to remain unobtrusive and under the radar, Ambassador Stevens was not accompanied by a contingent of well armed security personnel?  9) Is it because of the secret nature of this Obama weapons transfer, that no plan "B" was ever in the works, i.e., no rescue and or extraction unit on ready standby in case the operation went sour?
  I honestly do not feel that this secret Benghazi plan of Obama's was meant to get anyone killed.  To the contrary, the entire plan was secret and covert, it was more than likely a plan to sneak Ambassador Stevens into Benghazi and along with the small continent of CIA personnel already there, facilitate the weapons deal, and sneak Ambassador Stevens out of Benghazi.  No one would have been the wiser, the Syrian rebels would get their much needed weapons and Obama would somewhere down the line take credit for turning the tide of battle in Syria, and once again accept accolades for his performance.  Unfortunately, that is not how things turned out for Obama.  His plan was found out and thwarted by oh...I don't know, let's say Vladimir Putin.  For those who aren't aware, Putin and Assad of Syria are allies, and Obama is an ally of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Never the twain shall meet, if you get my drift.  
  If you read my proposed questions, you'll notice that each one answers itself.  Also each one points the way to the hearing basic search for an answer to why did Obama and Hilary leave Americans behind in Benghazi to be slaughtered?  To save face, that's why.  Obama got caught with his hand in the proverbial cookie jar.  That's why Obama's people came up with that outrageous story that the attack at Benghazi was a result of some stupid You Tube video.  That's why they stuck to that story even as the speculations were spinning through the Internet and on a number of Conservative talk outlets.  That's why the administration still has the videographer in jail still today.  That's why Obama spent millions of taxpayer dollars on denial videos to be distributed throughout the Middle East.  There has always been the question in the back of my mind since Mohamar Qaddafi was overthrown and murdered in the streets.  Qaddafi was one of the wealthiest dictators, if not the wealthiest even in existence.  He was also known to possess the largest cache of weapons in all of the Middle East and North Africa.  After he was deposed, somehow silently, his extensive weapons cache fell from sight.  No one knew what happened to the weapons, and it appears that no one ever questioned their disposition.  In light of the theory I put forth today and a number of months ago, I content that Obama had those weapons confiscated and hidden somewhere in or near Benghazi for future use.  
  So, now, if you can keep an open mind regarding my Benghazi theory, then you already have the answer to the Congressional Benghazi Hearings.  
  The answer is;  "dead men don't talk!"  And that's why Obama and Hillary Clinton allowed Americans to be slaughtered and made NO moral attempt to save them.  
  I pray that the truth will stir the people of this country.  I pray that the guilty will be punished and responsibility will be brought to bear on all those who were complicit in the cover-up.  
  All nations use covert operations on other nations, and America is certainly no exception to the rule.  It is not the covert operation that I take exception too, it is the blatant disregard for the truth.  The families have a right to know why their loved ones were sacrificed, sometimes sacrifice comes with the job, the nature of the beast, as it were.  But when men and women are needlessly sacrificed for a political end, like a presidential election, or to simply save face, then justice must be done.  I have little confidence that our Congress will mete out punishment where punishment is due, and if they do, I doubt it will be any more than a slap on the wrist.  In my opinion, there is enough evidence to impeach the president and all those he has appointed.  In my opinion, based on passed performance since the onset of the Obama regime, nothing will be done.  
God help us!
Sincerely, 
The Watchman