IT'S NOT THE ECONOMY, IT'S THE MORALITY

Lack of morality is more like it!  No need to worry about nuclear fallout, we're already murdering our babies every day.

Ethic:  Principle of right or good conduct or a body of such principles.

 Remember when "ethic" actually meant something of good and high principle?  I do!  I remember when a person did something that the majority could look at and say that man has ethics, or he's ethical. 

  That definition doesn't hold true anymore.  Today, we have new ethics, new morality and in essence that means our society in general a slipped into mediocrity as far as ethics and principles go.  The following is an example of society's new ethics.  A recent article in the Journal of Medical Ethics reads like a moral horror story.  Regarding life and abortion, late term abortion, and now "post birth abortion".  Actually all three are murder, this post birth abortion, is mayhem and brutal murder in the enth degree.  Of course, in order to facilitate and justify the murder of newborns and beyond, another word for infanticide had to be found.  Scientists at the Journal of Medical Ethics have settled on "Post Birth Abortion".  Because the world has already been calloused toward the destruction of the fetus both in and out of the womb, called abortion, late term abortion, then the new Post Birth Abortion will be more easily accepted among the populace.  This is what a couple of the scientists wrote, if it doesn't make you cringe, then it is already too late to save this world.  " Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a "person" in the sense of "subject of a moral right to life".  We take 'person' to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her/his own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her/him."  Take a moment and re-read that statement, when your breathing becomes normal again, read the rest of their statement.  " Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life.  Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where embryo research on stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punisment is legal. 

  So what are these scientists saying?  That a new born infant is merely a 'potential person', as an infant cannot make decisions for itself, feed itself or determine a life direction for itself?  Therefore a baby really isn't going to be a person until it can prove it's worth and value to exist???  Yes, that is exactly what they are saying.  In other words, a baby, not necessarily a new born, but in fact way beyond that age is, according to the new ethics merely chatel property of the parent/parents, or maybe even the state in many instances.  This new ethic removes the sanctity of life, does it not?  Under new ethics, if a parent(s) are unhappy with the way their three year old is acting, then they could justify its extermination, and perhaps try again.  Justifiable homocide certainly takes on a whole new meaning under society's new standard of ethics, doesn't it?  Has our society as a whole actually degraded to a point of barbarism not seen since the dark ages.  Has life become so insignificant that it is ethical to literally throw a child in the trash like so much unwanted garbage?  My God, how have we decayed to this lowly position?

  Everything from the world's apathy toward the expansion of Islam, to attacks on Christians and now on their consciences.  It all stems from the degradation of morality, the destruction of the family unit and the departure from religious tenets that society once embraced.  Where is it all headed?  How long will it be before these so-called ethicists place the elderly in the same group as new borns?  How long will it be before scientists set time lines and restrictions for human existence?  At what age will a 'person' grow old enough to become a 'non-person', and thereby eligible for extermination?

  Ladies and gentlemen we are living in a country where our president views unwanted babies as punishments to their mothers.  A president without morality and without conscience who is encouraging and nudgeing the people in the same direction.  We cannot allow this to continue.  If it does, the slaughter of innocents will become common place.  Population control and the environment will be used as excuses to destroy human life, all presented to you as acts of kindness and for the good of the planet and the remaining people.  Good intentions???  The road to perdition is paved with good intentions!  The Bible tells us the road to hell is wide, and many will take it. 

  God is our way, it is imperative that the world repent and  pray and turn from it's wicked ways, so that God will hear from heaven and heal this land. 

  I grieve for my nation, and for the children of this corrupt and immoral society that is being created.

  God Help Us

Sincerely,

The Watchman

Rick Warren The Blustering Blowhard Blasphemer From Southern California

Rick Warren builds bridge to Muslims - ZIONICA.com

  Rick Warren, the head Pastor of Southern California, is out to convince Christians that "God" and "Allah" are one in the same.  I think it's time for Rick to re-read his Bible, and for that matter, re-read the Qur'an.  Obviously the 1st of the Ten Commandments escapes his memory.  "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me."  Pretty self explanatory, in my humble opinion, perhaps I'm not the theologian the Rick Warren is, but if I can figure it out, so should he.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Muhammad chose Allah to be Islam's supreme being from a host of false gods, and Allah himself was the one chosen out of several moon gods.  Sorry Rick Warren, but Allah bears no resemblance to the God of Abraham.  Allah did not create all that has been created.  Allah did not send his only son to earth to die for the sins of all mankind, including Muhammad.  Muhammad did not teach that Jesus Christ was Messiah, if he had, there would be no Muslims, they would all be Christians.  So where does Rick Warren get his ideas?  He makes them up, that's where.  Like most Christian men of the cloth, Rick Warren is deathly afraid of Islam.  When you consider that there are some 170,000 Muslims residing in Southern California, and they worship in Mosques established and run by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, I can understand his fear.  What I cannot understand is his cowardice in the face of God's and Christian's enemies.  Rick Warren, although he will never admit it, deems it necessary to appease Islam, rather than fight it.  Rick Warren, in my book is one of those luke warm Christians.  By partnering up, as he puts it, with Muslims, he denies his own faith and his own principles.  Like many politicians however, Rick, I'm sure thinks if he stands beside the Muslim while they are still relatively peaceful, when the Fatwa comes down, he hopes the Muslims will leave him and his church alone.  Not only should Pastor Warren re-read the Bible and the Qur'an, but brushing up on some Middle-Eastern and European history won't hurt him any either.  You don't have to read very much before you find that Islam, doesn't leave anyone they consider infidel alone.  Infidels, including appeasing Christians, will either be converted to Islam, or they will be made slaves, or they will be killed.  Unfortunately, the choice isn't up to the Infidel.  The Infidel is at the mercy of the Muslim conqueror.  Good luck Rick!!!

  To rid the world of this Islamic barbaric pestilence, they must be stopped, hard and fast.  There is no other way.  Pretending that Islam is nothing but a peaceful religion, and they do not mean anyone any harm, will not pull the plug on their plans for a new world wide Califate.

  Apologising for soldiers burning a few Qur'ans will not stop them from exacting violence upon the military in Afghanistan or anywhere else for that matter.  It's not the Qur'an or the burning of it that incites these uneducated barbarians, it's the blood thirstiness of the book itself.  Any excuse, no matter how small and ridiculous is excuse enough for Muslims to begin murdering Christians, Jews and Americans anywhere they are found.  As a perfect example, in the Muslim country of Pakistan (Obama's favorite, next to Saudi Arabia) they have been using the pages of the Qur'an as toilet paper, then they dump them into the sewerage like they were tissue.  Perhaps that wouldn't happen if Sears had continued printing catalogues in Arabic or Farsi, or if toilet tissue were readily available in Pakistan.  The fact remains, Muslims have less respect for their own so-called holy book than Christians have for the Holy Bible.

  Rick Warren has his head in the sand, if he actually thinks the Muslim Brotherhood respects him, because they do not.  In the eyes of the Brotherhood, Rick Warren is just another dhimmi (Sharia slave) that they will use to conquer the predominantly Christian West.  Rick Warren is just another useful idiot.  Is it any wonder 300 Muslims came to his Saddleback Church dinner.  They love this guy.  You can bet he didn't serve pork chops, out of respect of course.

Wake Up My Friends, soon it will be too late!

God Help Us, or and Rick, I don't mean Allah!!!

Sincerely,

The Watchman  

WHOSE CRUDE???

These are Texas' Oil Wells

  As the captioned photo above shows, these are oil wells in the state of Texas, this scene repeats itself in the states of Oklahoma, California, Alaska and a few others.  Suffice to say, drilling for crude oil, then refining it to make gasoline, diesel fuel, jet and aviation fuel, and a host of other products that people around the globe use every day, and most of the time without giving a thought about from where it first came from.

  The fact of the matter is, that crude oil is a natural resource, not unlike coal or natural gas.  Crude oil, natural gas and coal in many cases have been stored  for centuries in the bowels of the earth, in many places, natural gas is  found in pockets that may literally exist beneath homes and cities and roads, the same can be said for huge underground lakes of crude oil.  Deposits of coal are prevalent in many areas of this country, coal is so plentiful, that for over a hundred years, there have been family coal mines on private farms and homesteads.  Keeping these locations of natural resources in mind, I find myself asking, just  who really owns a natural resource?
  For many years, the oil companies have been responsible for locating, extracting and refining crude oil.  The question is; do the acts of locating, extracting and refining cause the crude oil to automatically become the sole property of the oil company performing these processes?  The same question can of course apply to natural gas and maybe even coal.  I believe the difference, is that coal and natural gas are subject to free market enterprise.  Where as crude oil is not.  The market for crude oil is based on a much more global scale.  Nations that are members of OPEC set controls and limits on oil extraction and delivery, thereby controlling the amount of oil that can be sold and refined into petroleum products.  OPEC member nations, including the United States are subject to the agreed controls of Oil Producing Countries, and not so much subject to free markets.  Although there is no doubt that the fluctuating economies and world affairs have their effect on oil production.  Then again, oil production can have serious effects on the economies also.  Bottom line however, governments of OPEC nations are the ones who dictate production and subsequently the price of a barrel of crude oil, and this cost and effect trickles all the way to the gasoline pump "per gallon price".  Now that we know basically who and what determines oil prices, we also know that it is not the free market.  
  The original question was, who actually owns the crude oil natural resources of any given nation?  Because the United States has been and continues, at least for the time being, to run on a capitalistic style free market system, we must assume that the oil companies are buying the oil they extract from beneath the ground of our country.  But, are they?  I don't think all Americans are reaping profit benefits from our natural resources.  Sure, the oil companies purchase "oil leases" from the federal government, but are they purchasing the crude oil itself?  If they are, then who is collecting the money for the American citizen?  Then of course we must ask, where's the money?  Of course, if the oil companies are not purchasing the crude oil they extract, then it should be understood, that it (the oil) is also not theirs to sell.    
  I personally feel that the American citizen, for the most part has been completely left out of the oil equation.  Only the citizens of the state of Alaska appear to be profiting from crude oil extraction, and that is because Alaska is selling their oil to the oil companies, and therefore every year citizens of Alaska receive a check from the oil companies for their share of crude oil profits made by oil companies.  That does seem fair, doesn't it?  Sure it does, it's Alaska's crude, because it's extracted from somewhere in the state of Alaska.  So I ask you, why aren't checks being cut to citizens of Texas, California and Oklahoma?  Is their oil any less valuable?  While we're at it, when Alaska became a state, their oil became a state right along with their dirt, snow, ice and rocks, and of course the people.  In my way of thinking, and I may be wrong, so this is just food for thought.  Why is oil found in Alaska owned by Alaskans, but oil found in Texas and Oklahoma belong to oil companies?  In actuality, we are the United States of America, are we not?  Then if we agree, why doesn't all the crude oil belong to all the citizens of the United States, including the Alaska, Texas, California and Oklahoma oil?  Crude oil is a natural resource found on America's soil, and on America's off-shore.  
  I know that oil companies take great risk in funding oil exploration, but when they find oil, the profits are substantially higher than their initial outlay.  I am in favor of the oil companies making profits, and huge ones at that, the more they make the better.  However, in my mind, the crude oil being extracted from soil, either on-shore or off-shore belongs to the American citizen, and as such owners, should be receiving remuneration from the sale of their oil.  I know, in America, we enjoy some of least expensive gasoline prices compared to other nations, especially in Europe.  So, perhaps in essence, that is where our profit sharing is, even as the prices reach $4.00 per gallon.  If that is the case, then all gasoline prices, not counting state, local and federal taxes, should all be the same.  By the same token, let's allow other nations to take care of their people, but America needs to take care of it's own, and that includes the sales of America's natural resources.   
  On another similar subject, how many American citizens know that the governor of Idaho either has, wants too, or intends to sell a 50 square mile parcel of American soil to the Chinese?  Well, it's true, it's factual, but it isn't very satisfactual, if you know what I mean!  It seems that China wants to build a 50 square mile all inclusive self-sustaining city, free of encumbrances and taxes, right in the middle of America.  Just between you, me and the fence post, I don't know who gave permission to the governor of Idaho to sell any such land to a foreign country, let alone, China!  The land that makes up the state of Idaho doesn't belong to the governor or the people of Idaho exclusively.  Idaho is a state within the and part of the United States of America.  As far as I know, America is not for sale, and no governor of any of our fifty states has a right to sell any parcel of America to a foreign country.  To allow this to take place, means the people in Idaho must have peeled one to many potatoes.  Worse yet, should the federal government approve a project like this, the ramifications will be devastating to all of America. With that in mind, I'm thinking Obama will jump to approve this Idaho debacle.  It would be just one more strategically placed nail in the American economy's coffin.  No doubt Obama is standing at the ready to hammer in that final golden spike.
God Help Us
Sincerely,
The Watchman    

SHARIA LAW IS CONTINUING IT'S CREEP INTO AMERICAN COURT ROOMS

America cannot survive under two distinct sets of Laws
A choice will soon have to be made, choose wisely!

Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses case, tells atheist he'd be killed in Muslim lands - Jihad Watch

  Now everyone knows there is no love lost between the Atheist movement in this country and myself.  More importantly however, I still believe in the United States Constitution and the laws that come from that founding document.  All of you have read my pieces regarding the infiltration of Islam into America, and you've all read my warnings of allowing Muslims to set up house-keeping in America.  Now pay close attention, "I have no beef with people who come here from the Middle East, unless they are Qur'an believing Muslims, whose entire reason for coming to this country is to establish Muslim communities and institute Sharia Law".  I hold, as I always have, that Sharia Law, is the antithesis of the U.S. Constitution and that they cannot both survive on the same piece of ground and they cannot be melded together, or work in unison in the same country.  To a Muslim, the Qur'an and Sharia Law are hand in hand, one in the same.  In America we try to keep government out of religion and religion out of government as much as possible. (A difficult task with this administration, granted that, we still try.)  Islam is the complete opposite.  Islam is an all inclusive way of life.  The Qur'an and Sharia Law are one in the same.  In America, we have freedom of speech and freedom of expression and freedom of the press.  Under Islamic rule, there is no freedom regarding any of these rights.  As a matter of fact, under Islam there are NO individual rights, period.  In America, we have always enjoyed freedom of religion, in Islamic lands, there is only one religion, Islam and one way of life, Islam.  Both of these are dictated through the Qur'an and executed and enforced through Sharia Law.  In America, our freedom of speech has always been protected by our Constitution and infringements and violence against an individual's right to freedom of speech, has and should always be met with American Constitutional Justice through our American court system.  So far, I believe we are all in agreement.
  I regret to inform you, that all is not well with America's court system.  I am referring to Judge Mark Martin in Pennsylvania, a judge who just happens to also be a Muslim.  It appears that he presided over a case where, during a costumed Halloween parade of Atheists, there was a man dressed as a Zombie Mohammad, and a man dressed as a Zombie Pope, both were parade participants.  As these two were walking the parade route the man dressed as zombie Muhammad was allegedly wearing a sign that said zombie Muhammad or something to that effect.  Along the parade route were spectators as usual, lining the sidewalks.  Two of the spectators were a man and his son, the man as it turns out was a Muslim.  As all good Muslims, he was deeply offended by the zombie Muhammad, so as all good Muslims do, he became incensed, and just had to show his son that violence is the way to defend Muhammad.  In front of his son he proceeded to accost the man in the Muhammad suit.  Needless to say, the police were notified, the Muslim spectator admitted to assaulting the Atheist in the Muhammad costume.  The police cited the Muslim for assault(? I assume).  Which brings us back where I started.  Now, the parade participants were, under American Constitutional law, well within their rights of peaceful assembly, freedom of speech and expression and if you include the alleged sign, freedom of press.  The Muslim attacker broke the law, and willfully and intentionally attempted to inflict injury on the victim.  In a courtroom however, he used the excuse that he didn't understand why it wasn't against the law in America to mock Muhammad.  Good excuse?  You decide!
  Here is where the rub comes in, and it's a huge rub, and it isn't going to stop anytime soon.  As a matter of fact this rub is already beginning to chafe.  The Judge, instead of explaining to the Muslim assailant that he is living in America, and we have the right to free speech here!  Assaulting a man for mocking Muhammad or any other Muslim holy figure, is the action that is against the law.  What ever happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse"?  This judge not only dismissed the charges against the Muslim man, but he proceeded to lecture the plaintiff about Islam and it's beliefs and laws.  He went so far as to tell the victim that had he been in an Islamic land he would have been put to death.  
  I have a big problem with this judge, and you should too.  Number one, when you live in America, you live by American law.  Number two, if you are a judge in America, you decide cases on American Constitutional Law, not Sharia Law.  This judge needs to immediately removed from the bench and be disbarred.
  I have been asking myself how a Muslim becomes a judge in America in the first place.  A Muslim pledges his loyalty to Allah, Muhammad and the Qur'an.  He does not pledge to uphold the Constitution first and foremost.  So, who made this Muslim a judge in the American court system?  And why?  I know, we have two legislators who are Muslim, they were even sworn in on the Qur'an, and I ask you, where does that come from?  Being sworn in on the Qur'an means absolutely nothing.  There is no honesty, integrity or justice in the Qur'an.  It  represents the most horrific, brutal and barbaric way of life left on the face of the earth.  Allowing Muslims to become Senators, Representatives, Judges and even Law Enforcement Officers in this country is an exercise in establishment suicide.  We've already proven that by allowing Muslims in the military. (Remember Fort Hood?)  Muslims cannot, by their own belief system go against another Muslim.  Yet, here in America, where political correctness is king, Muslims are now judging Americans in American courts, using Sharia Law.  Where is the justice in that, better yet, where is the logic in that?  Are we Americans just stupid, or what?  Have we been so dumbed down that we invite the murderer into the house, feed him, clothe him, respect his belief system, knowing full well that his intention is to kill us, but ignore that last fact, because we are so afraid to be called racist, Islamophobe, or bigot???!!!
  I have serious doubts that this nation will survive the impending onslaught of Islam.  We are in the midst of a Holy War, and not very many people see it.  I have never seen or heard of a nation of people who refuse to hear their enemy's own words and threats.  A nation of useful idiots who will intentionally look the other way as to not be witness to honor killings, genocide, murders of Christians and Jews around the globe, burning of Christian churches in Islamic countries, threats of terrorist attacks against innocent people here on our own soil.  America, are we so afraid of Islam, that we would just lay down our honor, our integrity, our passion for freedom?  Perhaps we are.  
  It is way past time to wake up America.  There shouldn't be not one single Mosque is this nation.  All Mosques should have been removed after 9/11.  The enemy is within the walls and we've invited them here.  At the very least every single Muslim Mosque, and school should be subject to regular unannounced inspections by authorities and closed down at the first hint of teaching violence against America in any way shape or form.  Instead, America's department of Homeland Security is targeting Christians and Patriots as potential terrorists.  It's all upside down, it's all upside down.  Is it any wonder why Islam loves this country.
God Help Us
Sincerely,
The Watchman   
        
 

GOD DOESN'T NEED TO BE BROUGHT INTO ANYTHING, HE'S ALWAYS BEEN THERE!!!

                                      Group aims to bring God into politics - ZIONICA.com

  For those of you who actually click on the link to this article, please understand that the person who wrote this little news tidbit works for the Texas Tribune and or KYTX CBS 19 out of Tyler, Texas, I'm not sure which.  Regardless of the original copy and the one printed here on the Zionica website, everyone missed the word "unalienable".  To clarify, allow me to say that "we were not endowed by our creator with certain "unalienable" rights.  The word is actually "inalienable".  To expound a bit further:  Inalienable: def: incapable of being given up, taken away, or transferred to another.  In the article itself, the journalist(?) is referring to the U.S. Declaration of Independence.  It occurs to me that either the Texas Tribune or CBS 19 should secure a valid copy of the Declaration or at the very least invest in a dictionary for use in the news-room.
  According to the article, a group of Christians who refer to themselves as "God and Country" was formed in response to a protest of the Nativity Scene on the court house lawn in Athens, Texas.  According to "God and Country" the United States of America is a Christian nation suffering from a "tyrannical government".  It is "God and Country's" intention to draw a line in the sand and aggressively and publicly defend our inalienable rights that we have been endowed with from our Creator.  "God and Country" claims that is our constitutional right to mix religion and government, as it was when this nation was founded.  "God and Country" argues that Christian pulpits have been bullied in recent decades into political silence for fear of losing their nonprofit status.
  It is my opinion that "God and Country" are 100% correct on all counts.  Plain and simple, Christians have been silent for way too long.  This small group would have no reason to exist had the entire Christian community stood up and refused to remove that Nativity Scene on the Athens, Texas courthouse lawn.  I mean the entire Christian community.  I mean Baptists, Nazarene, Catholics, Lutherans, and every other possible professing Christian denomination in and around Athens, Texas.  There should have been an outcry heard around the world.  Was there?  No, there was not.  So, once again a tiny portion of the Christian community must carry the entire weight on their shoulders, so that the rest of the not so aggressive Christians could sit back and talk about it in a Sunday school class.  How did that saying go?  "First they came for the Jews and I did nothing, because I wasn't Jewish, then they came for the Catholics and I did nothing because I wasn't a Catholic, now they are coming for me, and there is no one left to stand with me."  For the Christians that are left standing alone, what a feeling of abandonment they must be experiencing.  
  A word of courage for those who are members of "God and Country".  God has always been in politics, He's just been removed from the principle position He once held.  Make no mistake, He, in all His Glory is still there, always was, always will be.  The Lord does not force Himself on mankind, He just rewards those who recognize and follow His instructions.  When Americans stopped following God's instructions, America lost sight of God.  The Lord has blessed this nation and it's people for well over 200 years, recently the people have decided to worship each other and money, and soon God's presence was no longer felt.  That is why Atheism and immorality is on the rise.  That is why we are expected to tolerate what was once intolerable.  We are expected to find more and more ways to defy God and abandon our spiritual life for a material life.  It is important to remember that God doesn't move away from man, it is man that moves away from God.
  Our type of government was founded with this one principle in mind.  It was designed to work in unison with Christian morals and principles without which, it cannot be sustained.  We now have a movement in this nation to take America away from Christian morality and replace it with a moral relativistic society.  There is no room for God in a society that rewards and respects what God despises.  Without God, there will be no blessings upon this nation.
  Let's not strive to bring God into our politics, but to make God visible in our government.  If my people will repent and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and heal their land.  God said that, and God has never said anything He didn't mean.  The Lord keeps his promises.  He also said the wages of sin is death.  There will be no salvation for those who choose the sinful life and do not repent.
God Help Us
Sincerely,
The Watchman   

WHAT IS A CHICKEN NUGGET, ANYWAY???

   Having been fortunate enough to be raised in farm country, I consider myself somewhat of an expert, especially about chickens.  Not only have I been where they are raised, bred and butchered, but I have cooked chicken several ways.  I can honestly say "I have never seen a hen or a rooster sporting a "nugget."  If anyone from the USDA or FDA or the North Carolina Education Board can show me even one single chicken that has a "nugget" that is naturally connected to it's body, then I will apologise, retract and eat that particular nugget. 

  If I spent a couple of hours, I'm sure I could come up with several articles condemning the use and consumption of processed meat and poultry.  So, since when did the proverbial chicken nugget become health food?  Who, in their infinite wisdom decided that the chicken nugget belonged on the USDA list of healthy food for youngsters? 

  This entire healthy food ordeal brings into question, why is it now so imperative to provide a government designed lunch for the kindergartner?  Personally, I don't think a healthy lunch has anything to do with it.  I think this USDA school lunch menu and inspection is just another way for the government to take over raising your children.  Somewhere along the way, government decided that parenting ends with birth, then you give up your child to the government to raise as they see fit.  I also can't help but think that those folks out there who have opted to home school, be prepared for the government inspector to be knocking on your door too.  Actually, the way this government has been executing its assaults on "We The People", you may need to be expecting an entire "guns drawn, all out raid, with flash bangs, tear gas and a SWAT team storming your kitchen."  Don't be surprised if they raid your refrigerator while they're there, and confiscate any frozen pizzas you may have hidden in the freezer section!  They may suspect of wanting to feed them to the kids when nobody is looking.  I know this scenario sounds a little off the wall, but I'm telling you, the government has invaded homes for a lot less.  For example, according to a study by the Cato Institute that specializes in civil liberties, there have been possibly as many as 40,000 law enforcement para-military home invasions per year.  Most of these in the middle of the night, no warning, no warrant.  Many of these raids have resulted in many needless deaths of both innocent and guilty homeowners and some officers and even children.  Now, understand that most of these raids were initiated on the pretext that the homeowner was an armed law-breaker, i.e., drug dealer etc., etc.  However, most law-breakers were of the non-violent category and way too much innocent blood has been shed in these operations of government law enforcement agencies.  Just down the street where I live, a couple of years ago, the police raided the wrong house in the middle of the night, the homeowner thought it was criminal invasion, he fired in self defense, the he was killed by the law enforcement officers.  So, be aware, that if it becomes a law that feeding the government's children anything other than what the administration deems edible, your home could very well be invaded in the middle of the night, just like the scenario I described earlier.  Additionally, if anyone in your home is a registered gun owner, take extra precaution, because the police will shoot, that's for sure.  You may die, because you don't stock USDA approved chicken nuggets in your refer.

  Needless to say, the long arm of our government has gotten way, way too long!!!  Reaching into homes to control energy consumption, water consumption, now reaching into your home to determine if you'll be feeding the children that now belong to the state and federal governments, the properly prescribed diet.  Make no mistake, if this, another power grab of the Obama White House is allowed to continue.  Your children will NOT be your children anymore, they will be the children of the state, and you'll merely be guardians of federal property. 

  Sounds way to Orwellian for the United States of America, doesn't it?  Let me assure you, it is not.  By the year 2015 it is the plan to have thousands of unmanned spy drones in the skies spying on your every move.  Does that sound Orwellian?  It does to me too, but it is in the government's plan.  Do not make the mistake of thinking it can't happen, because it is happening, right here and right now.  Don't believe me, go ahead check the Dept. of Homeland Security website.

  Student lunches, control of education, control of health care, control of religion, control energy consumption, banking control, industrial and manufacturing control, automobile control.  I mean, look at "Progressive" ( Progressive, just another word for Communist) Insurance's new spy module you connect to your car, so they can determine how far, how fast and where you're driving.  All under the guise that if you are a good (little robot) driver, as determined by the electronic spy module, you'll get a break on your insurance premium.  I don't know about you, but I'm not willing to give up my personal privacy to save a $100.00 a year on an insurance premium!!!  You've seen their commercial, they make it sound fun, you even get to install the spy module yourself.  (useful idiots)

  We have been warned about all these things through Bible Prophecy, through men like George Orwell and C.S. Lewis, men who had a vision of the future, to them it may have been science-fiction, to us, in this age, it is reality.

  God Help US

  Sincerely,

  The Watchman