Monday, August 26, 2013

IF YOU'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THE OTHER SHOE TO DROP!!!

Well, here it comes!!!
Intelligence insider: Obama administration agenda to "kill U.S Dollar" « Northeast Intelligence NetworkNortheast Intelligence Network

New Freedom, 1913: "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately.  Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.  They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."  (Woodrow Wilson)
February 7, 1950:  "We shall have world government whether or not you like it- by consent or conquest." (James Warburg; International financier speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee.)
Circa 1916:  "I am a most unhappy man.  I have unwittingly ruined my country.  A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.  Our system of credit is concentrated.  The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.  We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.  No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

  Why have I started this Blog post with the above quotes from a president that almost every conservative hates?  For two reasons, one that Woodrow Wilson is not entirely to blame for establishing the Federal Reserve.  At least not anymore than 52% of Americans are entirely responsible for electing Barack Obama twice.  Woodrow Wilson was duped just as the people who support Barack Obama. It is my opinion that Woodrow was as much a victim of circumstance as "We the People" in today's light.  Reason number two;  These three quotes should help people to awaken from their Obama Socialist stupor.  There are many quotes and warnings from way back in the history of our great country.  Warnings from the Thomas Jefferson era, and right through JFK, the signs of intentional attempts of America's financial destruction permeate the news every day, if you know where to look.  But, why is no one talking about it?  Because the plot to kill the U.S. dollar is so big, so deeply seated in politics that "fear" keeps mouths closed, and eyes shut.  I would venture to say that an elected servant of the people in D.C. cannot even look the other way for fear of seeing a new corruption in that new direction.  So, much of the underlying corruption falls squarely on the shoulders of those who have decided not to see what is happening. 
  Bottom line, once the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the American people not only lost control of their elected politicians, but lost control of the almighty America dollar as well. 
  In 2011, economist Kyle Bass interviewed a senior Obama administration official, the question was asked:  What are the planned solutions by this administration for fixing the U.S. dollar?  The answer floored Kyle Bass, and the answer should floor all of you also.  The answer was a simple 7 word sentence.  "We're just going to kill the dollar."   If that's not an ominous warning of things to come, what is?  This makes me feel like I'm standing in the shadow of the falling shoe.  According to my Webster's New World Dictionary the word kill is defined as:  1. To cause the death of; to slay.  2.  To destroy; to put an end to.  Need I go on?  Of course not!
  In order to understand how we managed to get to where we are today, one must understand the motivation behind the need for control and domination.  Concisely put, throughout the history of the world, domination and control of the masses has been an inherent trade of human kind.  Humans are essentially corrupt and for lack of a better description, of a sinful nature.  The need to dominate and control is what progress is made of, is it not?  Of course it is, and that need to have more, be better, gain control and dominate is what makes and or breaks the rulers and nations and empires.  Does the word "greed" ring a bell?  It certainly does, but is greed all that bad?  Some scholars will tell you that without the underlying greed of mankind, there would be no dominating nations or financial world powers.  Suffice to say that in some varying degrees, we all want more out of life.  The key words here are "varying degrees".  If you and I have a need, a compulsion if you will, to have a newer and better car than your neighbor, it's understandable, isn't it?  Then there are those whose compulsion is of a more intense degree, like those who live alone in a 20 bedroom mansion at the highest point of visibility, simply because they can, and that is called domination of the neighborhood, isn't it?  As stipulated by our founding fathers, we are all endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these are; life, liberty and the pursuit  of happiness.  If gaining untold wealth and power is the fruit of your particular pursuit, then that too is understandable, is it not?  The ultimate problem with all of this, is not that you have amassed wealth, and that resulted in gained power and domination, it's how you gained those attributes, and what your intentional use of your attributes will be, or is.  Ah, finally the crux of the problem.  Because humans a born with a sinful nature, then in many cases that sinful nature breeds sinful acts.  "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely."  A familiar adage, but an appropriate one none the less.
  There are those in society who have the undying motivation to gain absolute power and only total world domination will satisfy that motivation, although satisfaction for those people may never come to fruition.  Yes, it is a pure case of insanity through determination to control all there is to control.  And make no mistake about it, since the beginning of time there have been men who suffer from this form of insanity, and they have, as always found each other.  They seek out collaborating partners in their unending quest to literally dominate the world and all that's in it.  They plan and they scheme and the murder, they are instrumental in the rise and fall of empires, nations, rulers and societies.  They are patient, they are covert and they are diligent and deliberate in their actions and their manipulations.  Consider this; the beginning of the end of America's Constitutional Republic began at it's onset, way back in 1775 give or take a decade.  
  Now, before you begin that little non-believing snicker, hear me out.  The terminology "Illuminati" wasn't something manufactured by conspiracy theorists of the 19th and 20th centuries.  There is too much evidence concerning the "Illuminati" that validates their existence both hundreds of years ago, and today.  Who are the "Illuminati"?  I don't believe that anyone, other than the top 4 or 5 know who they really are, where they live or how truly wealthy they might be.  But, rest assured they are in existence today, and they control virtually everything financial and political, around the globe.  We all know that a number of people have been named and accused of being "Illuminati", everyone from George Washington, to George Soros and even both of the Bush presidents.  And though all these men have managed to amass great wealth, compared to the top 4 or 5 "Illuminati", these people are paupers.  (You must understand, the Illuminati not only control their wealth, but they control yours too.)  I like to call these medium wealth laden men, as "facilitators", they have been allowed to gain wealth because someone needed their greed as useful pawns in the world domination game.  There have been many wealthy men and women throughout history that the "Illuminati" have groomed to be facilitators of the world domination and control plan, that "One World Order".  
  The "Illuminati" have been instrumental in creating wealthy men and women, and wealthy governments as well.  Even forms of governments are at the mercy of the "Illuminati".  For example, Communism, in it's purist form is ideal.  Think about it, if no one has more than the other, or less, and all people under a pure Communist rule would be equal in wealth and every aspect of their lives would be as satisfying as the next guy, sounds boringly Utopian.  But the "Illuminati" sticks it's long reaching finger into everything, and corrupts it.  The "Illuminati" know that a Pure Communist state cannot exist for very long, and why you ask?  Because of that inherent sinful nature we humans are born with.  Simply put, not everyone is going to be happy and content when human nature encourages us to want more than the next guy.  Although not conducive to prosperous living, the Communist way of ruling came in very handy to keep a population of rebellious people on hold for a number years.   The "Illuminati" are the epitome of greed they thrive on it, and they use man's inherent sinful nature to facilitate their idea of utopia.  That's correct, the One World Order.  
  There is no Democrat Party or Republican Party or Independent Party in American politics, there are only those who are victims of the Elite facilitators of the "Illuminati".
  In the end, there will be one result, the intended destruction of the World Reserve Currency more commonly know as the American Dollar.  That is the other shoe I was talking about.  It is going to drop, it is in the air right now, and it was placed in the air by one uniquely groomed facilitator named Barack Hussein Obama. 
  The "Illuminati" aren't referred to by that name anymore, I read somewhere that they prefer the moniker of "The Establishment", because that's what they've accomplished, and finally after all these many decades, maybe centuries, they are about to realize their dream of uncontested world domination.  
   One can still call the very existence of the "Establishment" a conspiracy theory, because that is exactly what they want you to see.  It's not unlike a Mason who is below the rank of 29th degree.  To the Masons between 1st and 29th degree the truth of their organization is a mystery to them.  Most believe they belong to an organization that does only good things for their community.  It is only when the Mason becomes a 30th degree that he is told that the entire organization is based on the worship of Lucifer.  They would then find out that the Free Mason's underlying motive is evil in every way shape, and form.  But that's for another Blog post.
God help us.
Sincerely,
The Watchman

         
   
    

Friday, August 16, 2013

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU CROSS.......???

What do you get when you cross a Bully with a moron?  Why, you get California Governor Jerry Brown!
 
 
 
  Well, don't get me wrong, there are many folks, well educated folks in America who think that they can legislate immorality and second guess Almighty God.  It appears that the California state legislature and California's Governor, have decided that children that are born with certain gender positive genitalia may have been created, well... in error.  So under the guise of protecting the .1% of gender confused children from school bullies, the law makers have decided to bully 99.9% of all other school children.  In my opinion the California legislature has targeted young impressive girls between the ages of 6 though 19 for their obvious perversion of God's natural law. 
  I'm still trying to determine when little boys and little girls suddenly become confused as to what gender they are.  Is it when a parent, or both parents wanted a little girl child, and God blessed them with a little boy child instead.  Did the parents begin by dressing the little boy like a girl?  Did they purposely allow his hair to grow long?  Did they by him Barbie dolls instead of Tonka trucks to play with?  When the little guy was age six, did the parents keep asking him if he wanted to be a girl?  I don't think, in my heart of hearts that any 6 year old boy would care one way or the other about his sexual persuasion unless his mind was unduly influenced by his family authority figures.  These questions remain to be answered for another time, as this article is not about the children per say.  Instead it is about the perverted and immorality of the California state government.
  I have listened to a number of conservative talk shows, both on TV and on the radio.  As a result, I've come to the conclusion that many, if not all of them consider this new California state a joke.  If it is a joke, it certainly isn't even remotely funny.  Has anyone taken into consideration the feelings of the little girl who has been sexually abused by a family member, by an older brother, male cousin or uncle, or God forbid a father?  How about the poor little girl who has been sexually abused on the playground, or on the way home from school, or on the school bus?  
  When I was going to school, many, many years ago, the girls always had one place to run to, one place they could feel safe, and that was the girl's rest room, or girl's locker room.  The girls room was always forbidden to the boys, even in jest and teasing, once a little girl went through the girls locker room or rest room door, the chasing boy stopped, and retreated.  The ladies room was that safe place, completely and totally off limits to the male of the species.  That is how it was, and that is how it should remain.  But thanks to the degenerates in a number of states, that safe haven no longer exists for little girls or ladies anymore.  
  According to California's newest and most perverse law, a male, or female for that matter can be any gender he/she desires to be, and has the right to use any rest room, any locker room, any shower and any dressing room he/she so desires.  I am not sure if a child who professes to be confused as to his/her gender, can choose to be confused on a day-by-day basis, or is it something that can be declared on an hour-by-hour basis?  My understanding is that there will be no questions asked, should a boy decide that he will be using the girls rest room this time, or next time.  Somehow I don't believe there is a requirement for a student to declare his gender confusion at the beginning of the school year, or can he/she state confusion by semester or quarter?  Can a so-called transgendered young man/woman change gender preference at any given time?  If a male student between the ages of 12-18 decides that he feels like a girl today, because he is attracted to one the girls who just passed through the girls room door, would that be considered a viable reason to shower with the girls/girls of his choosing?  I am inclined to believe that there are no restrictions, because the law to the best of my knowledge was enacted on the following premise:  Gender determination is now to be defined the "self-perception" of the individual and the choice of this individual isn't required to remain permanent.  I can't be the only male who foresees problems with this perverted and asinine law.  One of the things that bothers me most, will the obvious consequences of this brain storm be viewed as unintended?  No one with an well functioning cerebrum would be able to debate this legislation and then vote for it's passage.  Which brings me to one conclusion, and that is, very few if any California legislators have a brain function beyond that of the capability of reason of  Neanderthal.  Ah, but worse yet, the bill was passed on to the so-called leader of the state who has all the common sense of a grapefruit and in turn signs the bill into law.
  So, let me ask Governor Brown, the California State Legislature, and the parents of school age children in California, what answers will you have for the consequences that will surely follow this inane law.  To Governor Brown:  What will your answer be to the little 12 or 13 year old girl who is raped in the girls room by a 15 year old boy who claims to be gender confused, at least until he committed the forced rape of an innocent who last year counted on the safety of the girls room?  But this year her safe place was taken away.  Who is doing the bullying now Jerry Brown???
To the California State Legislature:  What will your answer be to that same innocent little girl who was raped?  Will you tell her that her safety and that of 99.9% of all the other students especially girls, was deemed irrelevant, and that she was sacrificed for the so-called right of some sexual deviant to follow her into the girls room because he perceived himself a girl.  At least until he saw you and suddenly became a male sexual predator and rapist?
To the Parents of that same little girl:  Okay daddy, what will your answer be to your little girl, your baby when she comes home from school, crying and tells you she was brutally raped by a boy who felt like he was a girl?   What will you say to her when she tells you that there were teachers around, but no one helped her, because they were afraid to be politically incorrect, they were frightened of being accused of be moral?  Daddy and mommy, what will your answer be when your little girl asks you why did you let it happen to her?  Are you going to tell her that it's the law now?  Are you going to admit to her that you knew the was a greater than average chance that she would be in harms way if you sent her to school today, but you didn't love her enough to keep her out of harms way?  Well my dear California parents, that is exactly what you are doing if you send your little girl off to school in California today!  
  Let me say this, and this is my opinion and mine only.  A parent with a school age daughter in California that sends her off to school knowing full well the potential harm she may come too, has no right to be blessed with a child, girl or boy!  If there ever was a time for good Christian parents to take a stand in California, this is the time.  If I lived in California, my little child would not see the inside of a public school until this law is rescinded!   To the California State legislature, I think you are a bunch of self-centered, politically correct Cretins, who not only shouldn't holding any office where laws are made, but you really have no place among the intelligent human race.  To vote on and pass a law of the lowest of low magnitude, to throw the rights of straight students under the bus to appease a sexually deviant society, is despicable at the very best.  Your immediate resignations would be well accepted.  Simply put the entire California Legislature is worthless.  The same goes for your beloved numb skull of a governor, for signing an asinine law.
  What can we expect from state legislative bodies these days?  In the Florida school systems, they are teaching that Muhammad is God's messenger, and instructs students that jihad is a duty of all Muslims.  Well, so I guess that the Muslims who murdered 3,000 Americans at the World Trade Center, were merely doing their religious duty, and we should just understand that.  Any school teacher in America that teaches from these provide text books should be relieved of their class rooms and their students forever.  But that's for another post, isn't it?
God help Us
Sincerely,
The Watchman    
          
  
 

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

THE EGYPTIAN PEOPLE HAVE OBAMA'S NUMBER...

Viral Anti-Obama Egyptian Video


 
  Okay, I ask you;  How is it that a very poorly educated multitude people in the Middle East can recognize Obama for who he is, but some 50% of well educated Americans can't see the forest for the trees?  
  If you haven't seen the Egyptian video as yet, I ask that you at least watch it.  I never in my lifetime ever thought I could agree with an Egyptian Muslim, but this video says it all.  When Egyptians can see through Obama's facade as the world's new messiah, and unifier of the populace, while so many Americans still look and listen to him like a bunch of awe-struck sheep, there is something seriously wrong in this country.
  There was a time (prior 2008 to be exact) when I would have taken serious exception to a video that made fun of the President of the United States, but not anymore.  I actually applaud the Egyptian people for their insight into the most destructive and divisive president America has ever known, to date that is!  I have no doubt that the Iranian people agree wholeheartedly with the Egyptian people, after all it was Obama in both cases that aided terrorists to remain in control or take control of both nations.  Obama's friends, the Muslim Brotherhood can always count on Obama, at least until he decides to throw them under the bus once they have served his purpose and that of his Progressive One World Order handlers.  Yes, his handlers, the elitists that speak to him in his office and on his iPhone.  People like Valerie Jarrett his personal White House assistant makes most of the decisions for Obama, his foreign policy decisions, in my opinion, are all hers.  He simply takes credit for the decisions that work out well and in his favor, and he denies the failures.  One must understand however, what appears to be an Obama failure, is actually a victory for Obama, and ultimately the control of the population plan(s) he has been groomed to implement.  As I've written a number of times in the past, if you look through Obama's eyes and those of his handlers, everyone is expendable.  Obama is one of those people who holds no loyalty to anyone, and he is the champion of everyone who aids in the facilitation of his agenda.  His loyalty lies with his cause, and only his cause.  Everyone and everything that is opposed to, or perceived to be opposed to the agenda is expendable.  You either ride with Obama and his agenda, or you will be run over by his agenda.  Creating chaos is this man's game, and he is good at it, very good!  He also sees himself as indestructible, and so far, he has been.  He refers to Benghazi, IRS, Obama-Care, NSA, FBI, and IRS as phony scandals dreamt up by conservatives, but he knows the truth, he knows he is as guilty as sin itself, but he has no fear of consequences, because he knows there will be none.  The people who groomed Obama and facilitated his election and re-election have a power far beyond that of Obama himself.  Many of those in politics who have opposed Obama have already felt the heavy hand of those who are truly in command.  One phone call from someone sitting around the table in the proverbial "Star Chamber", and people are quickly swayed to Obama's way of thinking.  People drop out of presidential races, even though they had significant leads, to leave room for a candidate with no chance of opposing Obama successfully.  Some people call this Chicago politics, and perhaps that is a good name for it, for lack of any descriptive that would be understandably better.  People can certainly relate to the terminology "Chicago Politics", there have been plenty of gangster movies to show just how convincing the Chicago mob can be.  In my opinion, and this is only my opinion, "the people behind Obama and his agenda make the Chicago mobsters look like pussy cats and alter boys in comparison."  
  So, where does the blame lie in regards to the shape of this nation, and as far as our role on the world stage?  Why can the NSA, FBI, IRS and numerous other government agencies usurp the Constitution without accountability?  Why can the Federal and Supreme Courts legislate from the bench?  Why are all levels of law enforcement agencies being militarized?  Why does your local town police department need anti-personnel tanks and armored vehicles?  Who gave permission to the servants of the people to dictate to the people?  Why is God being rejected, and Allah being exalted?  Why are our children being taught that two moms or two dads are just as normal as a mom and a dad, or even more so?  If you have asked yourselves any or all of these questions at any given time, then you are aware of the severe "skolios" (Greek for bent or crooked.) that our nation and our government is exhibiting.  Simply put corruption has infiltrated the heart of our Republic and has taken up residence like a cancer.  Our government is no longer there to serve and protect, but to dictate, intimidate and lord over the people.
  As I asked, who is to blame?  Is it even worth the effort to place blame?  In a way, blame has worth, because when the next election comes to pass, and if you see it as a free and fair election, then all these questions require answers, prior to pulling the handle, or punching the chad, or pushing the button.  When I consider the performance of so many of our currently elected servants, I find little evidence that  gives allusion to me that any coming election will be free and fair.  (Instead, I'm left with the illusion that the election was free and fair.)  But if it is, it is imperative that all the above questions be asked and answered by all government and would-be government officials.
  Why do I bring up coming elections?  Because I know where to place much of the blame for our nation's current corruption.  The blame stands directly upon the shoulders of the voters.  It is the voters who placed Obama in the White House, twice.  Not simply those who voted for Obama, but on the shoulders of those who did not vote at all.  Our Constitutional Republic was set up to give the people command over the government, and this was done through the "vote".  Those who did not find it important enough to vote, are just as much to blame as those who voted.  
  If there is a crook in your neighborhood, and you leave something out for him to steal, do not be surprised if that item is gone come morning!  By the same token, if you elect (either by vote or lack of vote) a would-be dictator to the highest office in the land, do not be surprised when he exercises the permission you gave him to dictate.  It should be apparent to all of us that our Constitutional rights and liberties, as well as our inalienable rights endowed by our Creator have been left in plain sight and unguarded, and are being stolen from us right before our eyes.  And yet, there are many who have been indoctrinated enough that they willingly cede their liberty and freedom for the promise of free stuff and false security.
God help us.
Sincerely,
The Watchman       
    

Thursday, July 18, 2013

BECAUSE THE TRUTH HAS NO AGENDA




 
 
Because the truth has no agenda, it simply is what it is!
 
Because the facts are the facts, and one cannot argue against the facts!
 
Because the truth is self-evident, especially if you open your eyes to see the truth for what it is!

Because: "The day we see the truth and cease to speak, is the day we begin to die." (Martin Luther King Jr.)

"Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows." (Martin Luther King Jr.)  

" Nothing is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."   (Martin Luther King Jr.)

   I pray, the Black American Community would take to heart the words of their most famous and respected leader, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.   They should consider the corrupted words of today's corrupted leaders, simply corrupt those who heed them.  Following the lead of Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson and their likes, will lead the Black American community down the road to perdition, and nowhere else!!!

Please click on the link provided above and read the short but truthful letter.

"I'm passing it along, because I agree 100% with the letter, and I do not feel guilty about anything.  I am White and I too am proud!!!"

God Help Us
Sincerely,
The Watchman



 
 


Wednesday, July 17, 2013

SOME CALL IT PASSION, I CALL IT INCITEMENT TO BARBARISM!!!



  Someone once told me that "Blacks" are a passionate people.  I believe that all people can be and should be passionate about anything they strongly believe in.
  The incitement to violence is a far cry from passion, it is the work of the devil. 
  It never ceases to amaze me how much "hate" towards White people exists in the Black communities across this country.  I've never known how people who enjoy unearned benefits can literally "bite the hand that feeds them." 
  I can truly understand how the family of Trayvon Martin must feel, and I certainly share in their grief, but as a Christian I share the grief of all families who lose loved ones, whether it be to an accident, or illness, or violence.  I sympathize with the communities from which they come.  What I do not agree with is the incessant outcry for vengeance against innocent people being perpetrated by so-called Black leaders.  A couple of points of clarification before I continue:  I do not believe their are African-Americans, I believe there are Americans of various color and national origin, however, if you were born in the United States, you are not African anything, you are an American.  If you are a Black American born in the past 100 years, you are not a slave, and you don't even know someone who is, or was a slave.  If you had a ancient ancestor who was a slave, you need to remind yourself of the hundreds of thousands of White men and women who died to gain your freedom in this country.  As free born Americans, you have the same inalienable rights that any other American born person has, regardless of your color.  Your rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are endowed by your Creator, and since the end of the American Civil War, your inalienable rights are understood, and accepted all American people, yes even White people.  Since the 1960's, people who are Black in color have been the recipients of benefits, most of which have not been afforded to peoples of other color, so it's time to stop crying victim and move on.  You, as Black Americans enjoy the same rights as all Americans, White people owe you nothing.  What you do with your right to pursue happiness is entirely your decision, stealing wealth from White Americans is not a right, it's a benefit that some politicians thought you should have, and passed laws giving you money, that someone else earned.  When rioting and whining Black Americans awaken from your free stuff, and I'm oppressed stupor, perhaps you'll look around and see what successful people of like color have accomplished, and then move forward and do likewise.  You may someday realize that other Americans will not always be there to support you, and you will one day have to earn your own way.  Just as a general principle, "killing" Whitey will not get you anything but trouble in the end.
  Men, and I use the term with caution, like Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, and Eric Holder are doing Black Americans a huge and detrimental disservice.  Inciting people to riot only boosts their ego, and the more Blacks that follow like sheep, the more power they have to keep you under their yoke.   Every one of those men I mentioned should be in jail right now, for inciting unrest, they are no better than the criminal that yells FIRE in a crowded dark theater.
  I have a real problem with the New Black Panther Party and it's leaders.  Let's see there is Malik Zulu Shabazz and a relative I assume named King Samir Shabazz.  If those aren't two of the most ridiculous and made up names I've ever heard.  What is a Shabazz anyway?  It's certainly not any African name I've ever heard!  What is it that attracts good hard working Black Americans to listen to these street thugs?  Black Americans need to understand, when some moron like Shabazz declares war on "Whitey", he includes all Black people.  If in fact the New Black Panthers begin the indiscriminate murder of innocent White people, does the Black community think that "Whitey" will simply take that kind of violence in stride, without retaliation.  Declaring war on Whitey will not be conducive to good health for Black Americans.  If any thing, uncalled for violence will be met with violence.  A war between the races is something that Black Americans do not want, under any circumstances.  It is the Black violent leaders that have their people enslaved, not innocent White people!  
  As a precaution, White Americans need to steer clear of predominately Black neighborhoods, at least for a little while.  Regardless of the turmoil, White people should be prepared to defend themselves.  True Black leaders need to caution their people of the consequences that will most assuredly come from violent, unprovoked attacks on White Americans.
  The justice system worked for George Zimmerman, and if in fact Trayvon Martin continued banging Zimmerman's head on the concrete, when he should have stopped, and taken the opportunity to walk away, then justice was served for Trayvon Martin also.
Sincerely,
The Watchman            
 
    


















Sunday, July 14, 2013

WHAT IF???

GENERALLY ACCEPTED SCIENTIFIC EXAMPLE OF THE EARTH'S MAKEUP

  For many thousands of years and in today's understanding it is safe for us say that "thing's change".  Many things do change, but what if???

1. The earth has never changed since it's creation.
 
2. Scientific theory regarding earth science are upside down and backwards.
 
3. The assumption of evolution has been the basis for all science, and the sciences have been wrong all this time.
  I submit to you that the above three statements are not only correct, but if our scientific community would put some thought and research into them, they could prove my statements to be factual.  Of course the scientific community and a majority of academia would have to lay aside all the preconceived theories and notions and research my statements strictly on their own merit.
  On Friday July 12, 2013 an article written by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh came across my desk.  The title was: Liberal Doom and Gloom 90 Years Ago.  In essence the article was about how the scientific community circa 1920's was responsible for an article in the Washington Post dated November 2, 1922.  The article cited:  "The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and some the seals are finding the water too hot".  Through results of ocean soundings it was discovered that the Gulf Stream was very warm, at least to the depth of 3,100 meters.  The Washington Post continued:  "Within a few years, it is predicted that due to ice melt, the sea would rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable."  Obviously, that didn't happen, it hasn't happened, and anyone with a modicum of intellect knows full well, it's not going to happen.  Basic high school science experiments have proven that when you melt ice cubes in a glass of water, the water does not overflow the glass, instead, the solid ice volume is replaced by the liquid volume.  So, what if science is totally wrong?  I do not want to spend too much time quoting Dr. Paugh's article, you can read it for yourself on www.canadafreepress.com and search for the article, it's very interesting and well written and certainly worth the read.
  There is the one paragraph in the good doctor's article that sparked my curiosity.  It concerns the "biogenic theory".  This is the theory that scientists have been teaching us for 250 years.  This is where we're taught that crude oil is the result of decaying dinosaurs and plants over millions, if not billions of years of evolution.  This is the way we've always looked at things, because we have always trusted the scientific community to speak the factual truth.  Placing faith in science has proven rather fruitless though, hasn't it?  I mean the grass and plants are still green, the sky remains blue, clouds emit rain, rain falls, waters the plants and quenches the earth's thirst.  Humans and animals breath in good air, and exhale bad air, which results in the CO2 that plants require for nutrient sustenance, for photosynthesis to occur, and all things natural take care of each other.  CO2 may be a green house gas, but it is NOT detrimental to plant life or the atmosphere, it is a necessary part of the Eco-system.  Suddenly, because there is money to be made, a number of our scientists are now telling us that CO2 must be curtailed.  If you want to watch plants die right before your eyes, cut off their supply of CO2.  If you want to watch humans get sick and die, cut off the supply of CO2 to earth's plant life.  In order to give credit where credit is due, it should be noted that the "biogenic theory" was originally formulated through research by Russian scientists 250 years ago. 
  Now here is the part that caught my eye and tickled my brain.  In the 1950's the biogenic theory was questioned and challenged by more Russian scientists, isn't that ironic?  Their view was one of controversy as it turned the "biogenic theory" on it's head, what  they postulated was that petroleum could form naturally deep inside the earth, and in that case, crude oil would not be a fossil fuel at all...  Interesting, isn't it? 
  This new Russian theory as you well know, has been shunned, discounted and outright forbidden in the scientific community.  Why, you ask?  Money, lots of it would be lost, kingdoms would fall, empires and emperors would be doomed.  How, you ask?  Simply put, if the earth constantly creates it's own supplies of petroleum, then the resource immediately becomes more infinite than finite.  Oil prices would plummet, as the theory that one day humans will run out of oil would be thrown out the window.  Controlling prices of an infinite naturally recurring resource would be sharply curtailed, if not impossible.  Perhaps, this is the reason most people have been kept in the dark regarding this 1950's Russian theory.
  Is it not possible that petroleum is actually a by-product generated by the extreme heat at the earth's core?  Is it not possible that the extreme heat melts and or breaks down certain elements around the core itself and the result is formation of altered elements that must be expended from the core?  Maybe, just maybe the way this elemental by-product is expended is as it liquefies it is pushed to the surface, all the while cooling and as it reaches the earth's crust, it reaches a density through the naturally occurring cooling process, that it thickens or gels and is forced into the crevices we call underground oil fields and fills them up.  Is it not possible that there are large deposits of petroleum found in areas where large crevices exist, and less in areas where crevices are smaller?  Is it not possible then that deposits of oil shale and coal are direct results of many years of  cooled petroleum manifested in various forms within the earth's crust?  Let's keep in mind the earth's crust is only 5 to 25 miles thick depending on where you are standing.  Not to mention that the closer to the surface of the crust the temperature is much, much cooler which could result in the different make-up between coal and oil shale, both are different forms of a solid material, made up of the same elemental properties.
  In the year 1900, the world was pumping approx. 1 billion barrels of oil per year, in 1950 that amount jumped to 5 billion barrels.  By the year 2000, a significant rise in production, to a mind boggling 27 billion barrels and in 2010 it was 30 billion barrels.  Is there something wrong with this picture?  All the while we have been told that oil is a fossil fuel, and it is running out, yet in 110 years production has increased by 29 billion barrels per year, and it's still pumping.  Why is that?  What fossil fuel increases the more you take of it?  Fossil fuel theoretically must decrease in supply as it is depleted, but that doesn't appear the case with petroleum.  Could it be that petroleum is not a fossil fuel at all? 
  Here is another occurrence I like to use an example.  The ocean supply of fish, I especially prefer to use shrimp.  Has it occurred to anyone that the more shrimp that are harvested, the more shrimp are available?  I do not have the numbers of harvested shrimp over the past 150 years or so, but you can bet it's phenomenal, it has to be, look at how much is consumed!   
  We are blessed to live on a unique planet, one that sustains human life.  We have renewable air to breathe each second, we have water to drink, we have plentiful supplies of plants and animals to eat and enjoy.  This planet we call earth didn't just come into being from a blast of non-existent space particles.  This earth of ours was designed to do what it has been doing since God created all that has been created.  Earth sustains us because it's Creator designed it that way.  
  If all things are based on the evolution theory, then all things related to this earth are of negative content.  The earth will supply until the Creator deems it to cease.  Evolution is a negative "theory" and Creation is a positive fact.   
  Climate change can be construed as either negative or positive.  Facts tell us that the climate always changes, it always has, and it always will change.  Man does not have the power to stop the climate from changing, any more than man can cause it to change.  The earth is a unique divinely created planet.  It is possible to ruin the environment by making things that do not biodegrade, by not picking up after ourselves, but these are physical things, not biological things.  The human and earthly biology has been and still is, a constant.  Man is not evolving, monkeys and apes are still and will remain monkeys and apes as they were created.  
  It is not difficult for us to understand that schemes like global warming, fears of climate change, oil is a fossil fuel and the countless tactics used to perpetrate money making scams, are in fact just that, money making scams.
  As far as the theory goes, I'm much more inclined to believe that our earth is of intelligent design than simply a freak of nature from a non-existent space particle.  My faith in the scientific community has been shaken over the years, and especially recently when the quest for money and not the quest for knowledge, became science's prime-mover.  Equally, my belief that the elected leaders have our best interest at heart is also shaken to the point of non-belief.  
  I place my faith in the Lord, the Creator of the universe.  Placing faith in mankind will lead to nothing but disappointment, that has been self evident time and time again.  God is constant, steadfast, and does not change.  His truth has no agenda and God always keeps his promises.  
God bless us.
Sincerely,
The Watchman